Apparent Variation in Measurement Size of Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver on Dual Contrast MRI.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to formally investigate the apparent variation in lesion size of hepatic metastatic lesions from colorectal cancer on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and dual contrast images of magnetic resonance imaging performed with both hepatobiliary and extracellular contrast agents. METHODS: Patients with known colorectal carcinoma who had undergone dual contrast liver magnetic resonance imaging were identified in our institutional database. Metastatic lesions were measured semiautomatically on both HBP and dual contrast images with a custom software tool that automatically identifies the lesion edge and thereby the lesion diameter. Lesion measurements from both sets of images were compared with a Student t test and Bland-Altman analysis. Lesions were also measured on both HBP and dual contrast images by 2 fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists. Measurements from the software and radiologists were compared with a Student t test and Bland-Altman analysis; interreader agreement was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 70 liver lesions in 39 patients was identified. Software-based measurements were significantly larger on HBP than dual contrast images ( P < 0.001), with a mean lesion size of 10.9 ± 4.2 mm for HBP and 10.5 ± 4.2 mm for dual contrast measurements. Radiologist-based measurements showed a similar trend, with HBP measurements being significantly larger than dual contrast measurements ( P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean bias ± 2 SD of +0.4 ± 1.6 mm for software-based measurements and +0.9 ± 2.9 mm and +0.7 ± 2.1 mm for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for interreader agreement was 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: Both software-based and radiologist-based measurements of colorectal cancer liver metastases are significantly larger on HBP than dual contrast images. Based on these findings, we recommend that longitudinal assessment be performed consistently on either HBP or dual contrast phases to avoid introduction of avoidable variability.