Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Importance of Feasibility Assessment in the Design of ctDNA Guided Trials - Results From the OPTIPAL II Study.
Callesen, Louise Bach; Boysen, Anders Kindberg; Andersen, Christina Søs Auður; Pallisgaard, Niels; Spindler, Karen-Lise Garm.
Affiliation
  • Callesen LB; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: loucal@rm.dk.
  • Boysen AK; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Andersen CSA; Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Pallisgaard N; Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Spindler KG; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 22(4): 421-430.e1, 2023 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37586928
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Both quantitative and molecular changes in ctDNA can hold important information when treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its clinical utility is yet to be established. Before conducting a large-scale randomized trial, it is essential to test feasibility. This study investigates whether ctDNA is feasible for detecting patients who will benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) response. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients with mCRC, who were considered for systemic palliative treatment and were eligible for ctDNA analysis. Mutational testing on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was done by ddPCR. ctDNA response from baseline to the third treatment cycle was evaluated in patients with detectable ctDNA at baseline. ctDNA maximum response was defined as undetectable ctDNA at the third treatment cycle, ctDNA partial response as any decrease in the ctDNA level, and ctDNA progression as any increase in the ctDNA level.

RESULTS:

Forty-nine patients were included. The time to test results for mutational testing on cfDNA was significantly shorter than on tumor tissue (p < .001). Progression-free survival were 11.2 months (reference group), 7.5 months (HR = 10.7, p= .02), and 4.6 months (HR = 11.4, p= .02) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. Overall survival was 31.2 months (reference group), 15.2 months (HR = 4.1, p= .03), and 9.0 months (HR = 2.6, p= .03) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Pretreatment mutational testing on cfDNA in daily clinic is feasible and can be applied in randomized clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility of ctDNA. Early dynamics in ctDNA during systemic treatment hold prognostic value.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Circulating Tumor DNA Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Circulating Tumor DNA Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article