Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance vs SPECT Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.
Arai, Andrew E; Schulz-Menger, Jeanette; Shah, Dipan J; Han, Yuchi; Bandettini, W Patricia; Abraham, Arun; Woodard, Pamela K; Selvanayagam, Joseph B; Hamilton-Craig, Christian; Tan, Ru-San; Carr, James; Teo, Lynette; Kramer, Christopher M; Wintersperger, Bernd J; Harisinghani, Mukesh G; Flamm, Scott D; Friedrich, Matthias G; Klem, Igor; Raman, Subha V; Haverstock, Daniel; Liu, Zheyu; Brueggenwerth, Guenther; Santiuste, Marta; Berman, Daniel S; Pennell, Dudley J.
Affiliation
  • Arai AE; Private consultancy, Kensington, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: andrewarai@icloud.com.
  • Schulz-Menger J; Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch Klinik für Kardiologie und Nephrologie Abteilung Kardio-MRT, Berlin, Germany.
  • Shah DJ; Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Han Y; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Bandettini WP; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Abraham A; Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Woodard PK; Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Selvanayagam JB; Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Hamilton-Craig C; The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Tan RS; National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
  • Carr J; Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Teo L; National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Kramer CM; University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  • Wintersperger BJ; University of Toronto, Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Harisinghani MG; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Flamm SD; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Friedrich MG; McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Klem I; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Raman SV; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Haverstock D; Bayer Pharmaceuticals LLC, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.
  • Liu Z; Bayer Pharmaceuticals LLC, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.
  • Brueggenwerth G; Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
  • Santiuste M; Bayer Pharmaceuticals LLC, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.
  • Berman DS; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Pennell DJ; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 82(19): 1828-1838, 2023 11 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914512
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

GadaCAD2 was 1 of 2 international, multicenter, prospective, Phase 3 clinical trials that led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of gadobutrol to assess myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in adults with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVES:

A prespecified secondary objective was to determine if stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was noninferior to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for detecting significant CAD and for excluding significant CAD.

METHODS:

Participants with known or suspected CAD underwent a research rest and stress perfusion CMR that was compared with a gated SPECT performed using standard clinical protocols. For CMR, adenosine or regadenoson served as vasodilators. The total dose of gadobutrol was 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. The standard of reference was a 70% stenosis defined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). A negative coronary computed tomography angiography could exclude CAD. Analysis was per patient. CMR, SPECT, and QCA were evaluated by independent central core lab readers blinded to clinical information.

RESULTS:

Participants were predominantly male (61.4% male; mean age 58.9 ± 10.2 years) and were recruited from the United States (75.0%), Australia (14.7%), Singapore (5.7%), and Canada (4.6%). The prevalence of significant CAD was 24.5% (n = 72 of 294). Stress perfusion CMR was statistically superior to gated SPECT for specificity (P = 0.002), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (P < 0.001), accuracy (P = 0.003), positive predictive value (P < 0.001), and negative predictive value (P = 0.041). The sensitivity of CMR for a 70% QCA stenosis was noninferior and nonsuperior to gated SPECT.

CONCLUSIONS:

Vasodilator stress perfusion CMR, as performed with gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight, had superior diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis and exclusion of significant CAD vs gated SPECT.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article