Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An umbrella review of the benefits and risks associated with youths' interactions with electronic screens.
Sanders, Taren; Noetel, Michael; Parker, Philip; Del Pozo Cruz, Borja; Biddle, Stuart; Ronto, Rimante; Hulteen, Ryan; Parker, Rhiannon; Thomas, George; De Cocker, Katrien; Salmon, Jo; Hesketh, Kylie; Weeks, Nicole; Arnott, Hugh; Devine, Emma; Vasconcellos, Roberta; Pagano, Rebecca; Sherson, Jamie; Conigrave, James; Lonsdale, Chris.
Affiliation
  • Sanders T; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Taren.Sanders@acu.edu.au.
  • Noetel M; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Parker P; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Del Pozo Cruz B; Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Biddle S; Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
  • Ronto R; Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA) Research Unit, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
  • Hulteen R; Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.
  • Parker R; Faculty of Sport and Health Scienchresholds for statistical credibilites, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Thomas G; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
  • De Cocker K; School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
  • Salmon J; The Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Hesketh K; The Health and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Weeks N; Department of Movement and Sport Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Arnott H; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Devine E; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Vasconcellos R; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Pagano R; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sherson J; The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Conigrave J; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lonsdale C; School of Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nat Hum Behav ; 8(1): 82-99, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37957284
The influence of electronic screens on the health of children and adolescents and their education is not well understood. In this prospectively registered umbrella review (PROSPERO identifier CRD42017076051 ), we harmonized effects from 102 meta-analyses (2,451 primary studies; 1,937,501 participants) of screen time and outcomes. In total, 43 effects from 32 meta-analyses met our criteria for statistical certainty. Meta-analyses of associations between screen use and outcomes showed small-to-moderate effects (range: r = -0.14 to 0.33). In education, results were mixed; for example, screen use was negatively associated with literacy (r = -0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.20 to -0.09, P ≤ 0.001, k = 38, N = 18,318), but this effect was positive when parents watched with their children (r = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.28, P = 0.028, k = 12, N = 6,083). In health, we found evidence for several small negative associations; for example, social media was associated with depression (r = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.19, P ≤ 0.001, k = 12, N = 93,740). Limitations of our review include the limited number of studies for each outcome, medium-to-high risk of bias in 95 out of 102 included meta-analyses and high heterogeneity (17 out of 22 in education and 20 out of 21 in health with I2 > 50%). We recommend that caregivers and policymakers carefully weigh the evidence for potential harms and benefits of specific types of screen use.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parents Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Nat Hum Behav Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parents Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Nat Hum Behav Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: