Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measurement properties of upper extremity physical performance tests in athletes: a systematic review.
Barbosa, Germanna Medeiros; Calixtre, Letícia Bojikian; Fonseca Fialho, Hilmaynne Renaly; Locks, Francisco; Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy.
Affiliation
  • Barbosa GM; Post-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Santa Cruz, RN, Brazil. Electronic address: germanna.barbosa@ufrn.br.
  • Calixtre LB; Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Petrolina, PE, Brazil.
  • Fonseca Fialho HR; Post-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Santa Cruz, RN, Brazil.
  • Locks F; Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Petrolina, PE, Brazil.
  • Kamonseki DH; Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil; Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 28(1): 100575, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38232688
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Upper extremity Physical Performance Tests (PPTs) have been used in sports contexts to provide functional status of the athletes. However, whether these tests present appropriate measurement properties to be considered a valuable measurement is not clear.

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically review the measurement properties of upper extremity PPTs in athletes.

METHODS:

Databases (e.g., Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, CENTRAL) were searched in March 2021. Two reviewers independently rated the methodological quality using the 4-point Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Quality of evidence was graded by measurement property for each test, considering the adequacy, the sample size, and the methodological quality of the studies.

RESULTS:

Fifteen studies were included with a pooled sample of 684 athletes. The PPTs analyzed were Arm-Jump Board Test, Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST), Finger Hang Test, Medicine Ball Explosive Power Test, One-Arm Hop Test, Posterior Shoulder Endurance Test, Pull-Up Shoulder Endurance Test, Repetition to Failure Assessment, Seated Medicine Ball Throw Test (SMBT), Seated Single-Arm Shot-Put Test (SSPT), Shoulder Endurance Test, Two-Arm Bent Hang Test, Unilateral Seated Shot-Put Test, and Upper Limb Rotation Test. Evidence synthesis provided moderate and high-quality evidence for sufficient inter-session and intra-session reliability of the CKCUEST, respectively. There was moderate evidence for sufficient inter-session reliability of the SSPT and for insufficient validity of the SMBT.

CONCLUSION:

The CKCUEST and the SSPT are sufficiently reliable in athletes. More studies are needed to investigate other psychometric properties for these tests and other upper extremity PPTs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Upper Extremity / Athletes / Physical Functional Performance Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Upper Extremity / Athletes / Physical Functional Performance Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Journal subject: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: