Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detection and Control of Pregnancy Hypertension Using Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure With Automated Telemonitoring: Cost Analyses of the BUMP Randomized Trials.
Campbell, Helen E; Chappell, Lucy C; McManus, Richard J; Tucker, Katherine L; Crawford, Carole; Green, Marcus; Rivero-Arias, Oliver.
Affiliation
  • Campbell HE; National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health (H.E.C., O.R.-A.).
  • Chappell LC; Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, United Kingdom (L.C.C.).
  • McManus RJ; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. University of Oxford, United Kingdom (R.J.M., K.L.T., C.C.).
  • Tucker KL; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. University of Oxford, United Kingdom (R.J.M., K.L.T., C.C.).
  • Crawford C; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences. University of Oxford, United Kingdom (R.J.M., K.L.T., C.C.).
  • Green M; Action on Pre-eclampsia, Evesham, United Kingdom (M.G.).
  • Rivero-Arias O; National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health (H.E.C., O.R.-A.).
Hypertension ; 81(4): 887-896, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258566
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pregnancy hypertension continues to cause maternal and perinatal morbidity. Two linked UK randomized trials showed adding self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) with automated telemonitoring to usual antenatal care did not result in earlier detection or better control of pregnancy hypertension. This article reports the trials' integrated cost analyses.

METHODS:

Two cost analyses. SMBP with usual care was compared with usual care alone in pregnant individuals at risk of hypertension (BUMP 1 trial [Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension], n=2441) and with hypertension (BUMP 2 trial, n=850). Clinical notes review identified participant-level antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care and these were costed. Comparisons between trial arms used means and 95% CIs. Within BUMP 2, chronic and gestational hypertension cohorts were analyzed separately. Telemonitoring system costs were reported separately.

RESULTS:

In BUMP 1, mean (SE) total costs with SMBP and with usual care were £7200 (£323) and £7063 (£245), respectively, mean difference (95% CI), £151 (-£633 to £936). For the BUMP 2 chronic hypertension cohort, corresponding figures were £13 384 (£1230), £12 614 (£1081), mean difference £323 (-£2904 to £3549) and for the gestational hypertension cohort were £11 456 (£901), £11 145 (£959), mean difference £41 (-£2486 to £2567). The per-person cost of telemonitoring was £6 in BUMP 1 and £29 in BUMP 2.

CONCLUSIONS:

SMBP was not associated with changes in the cost of health care contacts for individuals at risk of, or with, pregnancy hypertension. This is reassuring as SMBP in pregnancy is widely prevalent, particularly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. REGISTRATION URL https//www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT03334149.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pre-Eclampsia / Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced / Hypertension Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Hypertension Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pre-Eclampsia / Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced / Hypertension Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Hypertension Year: 2024 Document type: Article
...