Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships and Undergraduate Surgical Education: A Scoping Review and Gap Analysis.
Moya-Mendez, Mary E; Thornton, Steven; Rhodin, Kristen E; Gao, Qimeng; Leraas, Harold J; Vatsaas, Cory J.
Affiliation
  • Moya-Mendez ME; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Thornton S; Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Rhodin KE; Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Gao Q; Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Leraas HJ; Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: harold.leraas@duke.edu.
  • Vatsaas CJ; Division of Trauma, Acute, and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: cory.vatsaas@duke.edu.
J Surg Educ ; 81(3): 367-372, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272748
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) are an increasingly popular approach to medical student clinical education, and the literature describing them is expanding. Despite this, there is a lack of understanding for how surgery didactics and skills are currently taught as a part of the LIC curriculum.

DESIGN:

We conducted a scoping literature review in July 2022 using terms related to LIC and surgical education. Abstract and full-length text screening followed. Data extraction was completed in August 2022. Articles published in English, focused on LIC students, and discussed any element of LIC curriculum surgical education was included.

SETTING:

Scoping literature review.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 282 studies describing LICs were identified from the scoping literature review. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 (13%) studies describing some element of surgical education were included.

RESULTS:

Of these 37 studies, the majority did not delve into pertinent details related to students' surgery experience, expectations, and surgical skills accomplishments. Four studies (11%) reported on the outpatient surgical experience, such as minimum required time that students were expected to be in the clinic, and 8 studies (22%) described the inpatient and operating room exposure. Only 1 study (3%) described the surgical floor management of surgical patients, including tasks like documentation and wound care, and 3 studies (8%) reported formal assessment of surgical skills, such as suturing technique.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study highlights the paucity LIC literature examining the relationship between this curricular innovation and the unique needs of medical students on a surgical clerkship. Surgeon educators should embrace the opportunity to contribute LIC curriculum development and subsequent investigation into how this modality interfaces with the learning objectives of undergraduate surgical education. A formal description of essential curriculum components for all surgical LIC programs is needed to ensure appropriate surgical education across the varied LIC models.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Clinical Clerkship / Education, Medical / Education, Medical, Undergraduate Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Surg Educ Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Clinical Clerkship / Education, Medical / Education, Medical, Undergraduate Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Surg Educ Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: