Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring early adolescents' prosocial behavior toward diverse others: Considering multiple social identities.
Xiao, Sonya Xinyue; Gülseven, Zehra; Clancy, Erin T; Liew, Jeffrey; Carlo, Gustavo; Kim, Sarah; Jiang, Su.
Affiliation
  • Xiao SX; Department of Psychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
  • Gülseven Z; Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA.
  • Clancy ET; T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
  • Liew J; Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
  • Carlo G; Department of Education, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
  • Kim S; McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Jiang S; Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
J Adolesc ; 96(4): 841-854, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345133
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In a diverse society, individuals often need to make prosocial decisions toward others who vary on a range of intertwined social identities. Adolescence is a prime time to promote intergroup prosociality due to identity salience during this developmental stage. In this study, our goal was to develop and provide initial validation, of a novel measure on intergroup prosocial behavior considering gender and race/ethnicity.

METHOD:

We used two independent samples of early adolescents (N1 = 118, Mage = 12.21 years, 55% boys, 59% White collected nationally in the United States.; N2 = 133, Mage = 12.77, 51.1% boys, 77% White collected locally in Arizona).

RESULTS:

Using the data from Sample 1, Exploratory Factor Analyses revealed a two-factor solution capturing intergroup prosociality and personal distress. Confirmatory Factor Analyses with data from Sample 2 confirmed the factor structure. The reliability of intergroup prosociality was acceptable. Prosociality subscale was positively correlated with adolescentsempathy, sympathy, compliant, emotional, dire, and anonymous prosocial behaviors indicating convergent validity and negatively correlated with adolescents' public prosocial behavior indicating discriminant validity. Further, we examined whether youth engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior using both variable-centered and person-centered approaches, combining data from Samples 1 and 2. While adolescents did not engage in differential intergroup prosocial behavior, Latent Profile Analyses revealed five distinct profiles of early adolescents' intergroup prosociality. Overall, this study advances research on youth's intergroup prosociality across two intersectional social identities, moving beyond the conceptualization of single social identities in intergroup research.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Behavior / Social Identification Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Adolesc / J. adolesc / Journal of adolescence Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Behavior / Social Identification Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Adolesc / J. adolesc / Journal of adolescence Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: