Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Dense Breast Clinic: Initial Experience of a Patient-Centered Breast Imaging Clinic.
Robinson, Kristin A; Staack, Sasha O; Patel, Bhavika K; Lorans, Roxanne; Sharpe, Richard E; Kling, Juliana M; Maimone, Santo; Pizzitola, Victor J.
Affiliation
  • Robinson KA; Mayo Clinic Florida, Department of Radiology, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Staack SO; Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Patel BK; Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Lorans R; Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Sharpe RE; Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Kling JM; Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Maimone S; Mayo Clinic Florida, Department of Radiology, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Pizzitola VJ; Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Breast Imaging ; 4(6): 582-589, 2022 Dec 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416998
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Establish a radiologist-run consultation clinic to review breast density and supplemental screening exams (SSEs) directly with patients in response to breast density reporting laws.

METHODS:

Breast radiologists opened and staffed a clinic for formal patient consultations regarding breast density and SSEs. An IRB-approved questionnaire assessed patient knowledge of breast density, SSEs, and encounter satisfaction. Comparative statistical analyses were performed on knowledge-based questions.

RESULTS:

From February 2019 to February 2021, 294 reimbursable consultations were performed with 215 patients completing pre- and post-consultation questionnaires (survey response rate, 73%). Median patient age was 58 years (range, 34-86 years) and 9% (19/210) had a personal history of breast cancer. An increase in patient knowledge of breast density and SSEs was observed as follows breast density categories (9% correct pre-consultation (20/215), 86% correct post-consultation (185/215), P < 0.001), dense breast effects on cancer risk (39% correct pre-consultation (83/215), 84% post-consultation (180/215)), mammogram sensitivity (90% correct pre-consultation (193/215), 94% post-consultation (201/215)), and increased cancer detection with SSEs (82% correct pre-consultation (177/215), 95% post-consultation (205/215)) (P < 0.001). Post-consultation, 96% (200/209) were satisfied with the usefulness of information, 89% (186/209) strongly agreed they had sufficient knowledge of SSEs, and 81% (167/205) agreed they would like future opportunities to meet with a breast radiologist.

CONCLUSION:

A consultation clinic staffed by breast radiologists focused on breast density and supplemental breast cancer screening can provide personalized patient counseling, engage patients in shared decision making, assist referring clinicians, and support high quality patient-centered care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Breast Density Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Breast Imaging Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Breast Density Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Breast Imaging Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: