Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Omission of adjuvant radiotherapy in low-risk elderly males with breast cancer.
Vo, Kim; Ladbury, Colton; Yoon, Stephanie; Bazan, Jose; Glaser, Scott; Amini, Arya.
Affiliation
  • Vo K; College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, 309 E 2 ndSt, Pomona, CA, 91766, USA.
  • Ladbury C; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. cladbury@coh.org.
  • Yoon S; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
  • Bazan J; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
  • Glaser S; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
  • Amini A; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Breast Cancer ; 31(3): 485-495, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507145
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Randomized clinical trials demonstrate that lumpectomy + hormone therapy (HT) without radiation therapy (RT) yields equivalent survival and acceptable local-regional outcomes in elderly women with early-stage, node-negative, hormone-receptor positive (HR +) breast cancer. Whether these data apply to men with the same inclusion criteria remains unknown.

METHODS:

The National Cancer Database was queried for male patients ≥ 65 years with pathologic T1-2N0 (≤ 3 cm) HR + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery with negative margins from 2004 to 2019. Adjuvant treatment was classified as HT alone, RT alone, or HT + RT. Male patients were matched with female patients for OS comparison. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression and Kaplan - Meier method. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS:

A total of 523 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 24.4% receiving HT, 16.3% receiving RT, and 59.2% receiving HT + RT. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (IQR 5.0-9.4 years). IPTW-adjusted 5-yr OS rates in the HT, RT, and HT + RT cohorts were 84.0% (95% CI 77.1-91.5%), 81.1% (95% CI 71.1-92.5%), and 93.0% (95% CI 90.0-96.2%), respectively. On IPTW-adjusted MVA, relative to HT, receipt of HT + RT was associated with improvements in OS (HR 0.641; p = 0.042). RT alone was not associated with improved OS (HR 1.264; p = 0.420).

CONCLUSION:

Among men ≥ 65 years old with T1-2N0 HR + breast cancer, RT alone did not confer an OS benefit over HT alone. Combination of RT + HT demonstrated significant improvements in OS. De-escalation of treatment through omission of either RT or HT at this point should be done with caution.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mastectomy, Segmental / Breast Neoplasms, Male Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mastectomy, Segmental / Breast Neoplasms, Male Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...