Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Are the Real Issues in Providing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support: A Survey.
Siddiqui, Shahla; Arora, Lovkesh; Lupei, Monica I; Satyapriya, S Veena; Wall, Michael; Cobas, Miguel; Justice, Samuel; Bartz, Raquel R.
Affiliation
  • Siddiqui S; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Arora L; Divisions of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, ECMO Medical Director, University of Iowa and College of Medicine, Iowa City, IO, USA.
  • Lupei MI; Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Satyapriya SV; Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, OSUMC, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Wall M; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Cobas M; Professor of Anesthesiology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Justice S; Statistician, Brigham and Women's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Bartz RR; Associate Chair of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Intensive Care Med ; 39(10): 949-957, 2024 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571401
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

By using a novel survey our study aimed to assess the challenges ECMO and Critical Care (CC) teams face when initiating and managing patient's ECMO support.

METHODS:

A qualitative survey-based observational study was performed of members of 2 Critical Care Medicine organizations involved in decision-making around the practice of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). The range of exploratory questions covered ethical principles of informed consent, autonomy and goals of care discussions, beneficence, non-maleficence (offering life-sustaining treatments in end-of-life care), and justice (insurance-related limitations of treatment). Questions also covered pragmatic practice and quality improvement areas, such as exploring whether palliative care or ethics teams were involved in such decision-making.

RESULTS:

305 members received the survey links, and a total of 61 completed surveys were received, for an overall response rate of 20% among all eligible members. Only 70% of the participants who manage ECMO patients are involved in the ECMO initiation decision process. The majority do not involve Ethics or Palliative care at the initial ECMO initiation decision step. Of the ethical and moral dilemmas reported, the majority revolved around 1. Prognostication of patients receiving VV and VA ECMO support, 2. Lack of knowledge of patient's wishes and goals, 3. Disconnect between expectations of families and outcomes and 4. Staff moral distress around when to stop ECMO in case of futility.

CONCLUSION:

Our survey highlights areas of distress and dilemma which have been stressed before in the initiation, management, and outcomes of ECMO patients, however with the increasing use of this modality of cardiopulmonary mechanical support being offered, the survey results can offer a guidance using sound ethical principles.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Critical Care Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Intensive Care Med Journal subject: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Critical Care Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Intensive Care Med Journal subject: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: