Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electrode positioning errors reduce current dose for focal tDCS set-ups: Evidence from individualized electric field mapping.
Niemann, Filip; Riemann, Steffen; Hubert, Ann-Kathrin; Antonenko, Daria; Thielscher, Axel; Martin, Andrew K; Unger, Nina; Flöel, Agnes; Meinzer, Marcus.
Affiliation
  • Niemann F; University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Riemann S; University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Hubert AK; University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Antonenko D; University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Thielscher A; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Technical University of Denmark, Department of Health Technology, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Martin AK; Kent University, School of Psychology, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
  • Unger N; University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Flöel A; University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE Site Greifswald), Greifswald, Germany.
  • Meinzer M; University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany. Electronic address: marcus.meinzer@med.uni-greifswald.de.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 162: 201-209, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643613
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Electrode positioning errors contribute to variability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects. We investigated the impact of electrode positioning errors on current flow for tDCS set-ups with different focality.

METHODS:

Deviations from planned electrode positions were determined using data acquired in an experimental study (N = 240 datasets) that administered conventional and focal tDCS during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Comparison of individualized electric field modeling for planned and empirically derived "actual" electrode positions was conducted to quantify the impact of positioning errors on the electric field dose in target regions for tDCS.

RESULTS:

Planned electrode positions resulted in higher current dose in the target regions for focal compared to conventional montages (7-12%). Deviations from planned positions significantly reduced current flow in the target regions, selectively for focal set-ups (26-30%). Dose reductions were significantly larger for focal compared to conventional set-ups (29-43%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Precise positioning is crucial when using focal tDCS set-ups to avoid significant reductions of current dose in the intended target regions.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Our results highlight the urgent need to routinely implement methods for improving electrode positioning, minimization of electrode drift, verification of electrode positions before and/or after tDCS and also to consider positioning errors when investigating dose-response relationships, especially for focal set-ups.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electrodes / Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electrodes / Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: