No clear influence of treatment escalation on flare prevention in serologically active clinically quiescent patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of treatment escalation by initiating therapeutic agents in serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We retrospectively evaluated SACQ patients with SLE for ≥ 180 days, with the introduction of a therapeutic agent for SLE defined as exposure. The efficacy endpoints included the time to flare and time to remission, whereas the safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events. The efficacy endpoints were assessed via Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates, which included exposure, serological activity, and prednisolone dose. Among 109 SACQ patients, 24 were initiated on the following therapeutic agents for SLE hydroxychloroquine (10 patients), belimumab (6 patients), and immunosuppressive agents (8 patients). A total of 37 patients experienced a flare (8 and 29 patients during exposure and nonexposure periods, respectively). The time to flare was comparable between the exposure and control groups. Among 68 patients who were not in remission at the start of observation, 27 patients achieved remission (5 and 22 patients during exposure and nonexposure periods, respectively). Although both groups had a similar time to remission, the exposure group treated with belimumab had a significantly higher rate of remission than the control group. The adverse events were more frequent during the exposure period than during the nonexposure period. Thus, this study did not reveal a clear influence of treatment escalation on flare prevention and remission achievement.