Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of tDCS on inhibitory control and its transfer effect on sustained attention in children with autism spectrum disorder: An fNIRS study.
Chen, Liu; Du, Bang; Li, Ke; Li, Kaiyun; Hou, TingTing; Jia, Fanlu; Li, Li.
Affiliation
  • Chen L; School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, 250022, Jinan, China.
  • Du B; School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, 250022, Jinan, China.
  • Li K; School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, 250022, Jinan, China.
  • Li K; School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, 250022, Jinan, China. Electronic address: sep_liky@ujn.edu.cn.
  • Hou T; School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, 250022, Jinan, China.
  • Jia F; School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, 250022, Jinan, China.
  • Li L; BoShan Special Education Center School, 255299, Zibo, China.
Brain Stimul ; 17(3): 594-606, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697468
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have inhibitory control deficits. The combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and inhibitory control training produces good transfer effects and improves neuroplasticity. However, no studies have explored whether applying tDCS over the dlPFC improves inhibitory control and produces transfer effects in children with ASD.

OBJECTIVE:

To explore whether multisession tDCS could enhance inhibitory control training (response inhibition), near-transfer (interference control) and far-transfer effects (sustained attention; stability of attention) in children with ASD and the generalizability of training effects in daily life and the class, as reflected by behavioral performance and neural activity measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

METHODS:

Twenty-eight autistic children were randomly assigned to either the true or sham tDCS group. The experimental group received bifrontal tDCS stimulation at 1.5 mA, administered for 15 min daily across eight consecutive days. tDCS was delivered during a computerized Go/No-go training task. Behavioral performance in terms of inhibitory control (Dog/Monkey and Day/Night Stroop tasks), sustained attention (Continuous Performance and Cancellation tests), prefrontal cortex (PFC) neural activity and inhibitory control and sustained attention in the class and at home were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Training (response inhibition) and transfer effects (interference control; sustained attention) were significantly greater after receiving tDCS during the Go/No-go training task than after receiving sham tDCS. Changes in oxyhemoglobin (HbO) concentrations in the dlPFC and FPA associated with consistent conditions in the Day/Night Stroop and Continuous Performance test were observed after applying tDCS during the inhibitory control training task. Notably, transfer effects can be generalized to classroom environments.

CONCLUSION:

Inhibitory control training combined with tDCS may be a promising, safe, and effective method for improving inhibitory control and sustained attention in children with ASD.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attention / Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared / Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Autism Spectrum Disorder / Inhibition, Psychological Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Brain Stimul Journal subject: CEREBRO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attention / Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared / Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Autism Spectrum Disorder / Inhibition, Psychological Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Brain Stimul Journal subject: CEREBRO Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: