Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electrophysiological evidence of lexical processing impacted by foreign language reading anxiety.
Li, Lina; Yu, Qianqian; Wang, Yuru; Wang, Zhihao; Zhou, Xinyi; Guan, Qing; Luo, Yue-Jia; Li, Hehui.
Affiliation
  • Li L; Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, PR China.
  • Yu Q; English Department, Jilin Medical College, Jilin, PR China.
  • Wang Y; School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, PR China.
  • Wang Z; School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, PR China.
  • Zhou X; School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, PR China.
  • Guan Q; State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
  • Luo YJ; School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, PR China.
  • Li H; School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, PR China.
Heliyon ; 10(9): e30061, 2024 May 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720696
ABSTRACT
Extensive studies have been conducted on the impact of foreign language reading anxiety on reading, primarily focusing on pedagogy and behavior but lacking electrophysiological evidence. The current study aimed to investigate the influence of foreign language reading anxiety on reading and its underlying mechanisms. The results revealed a negative correlation between foreign language reading anxiety and foreign language reading performance, irrespective of the native language. Adults with low levels of foreign language reading anxiety (LFLRA) demonstrated a significant difference in early lexical component N170 amplitude between foreign and native languages. However, this effect was not observed in adults with high levels of foreign language reading anxiety (HFLRA). In terms of N170 latency, HFLRA showed a longer N170 for the foreign language compared to the native language. Furthermore, the N170 effects were predominantly localized over the left occipitotemporal electrodes. Regarding N400 latency, a significant difference was found in LFLRA individuals between foreign and native language processing, while HFLRA individuals did not exhibit this difference. These findings suggest that HFLRA individuals experience inefficient lexical processing (such as orthography or semantics) during reading in foreign language.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Heliyon Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Heliyon Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: