Outcomes of brachial artery transposition in hemodialysis patients.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In hemodialysis patients with a difficult access extremity who are not suitable for an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft creation, the concept of cannulating a superficialized artery for arterial outflow in dialysis sessions has been adopted as a tertiary alternative. However, its long-term patency and complications have not been recognized widely. We report our 16-year experience with hemodialysis access creation using the brachial artery transposition (BAT) technique. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent BAT for hemodialysis vascular access between June 1, 2006, and December 31, 2022. The patency of the whole access circuit and the transposed brachial artery itself was evaluated independently. RESULTS: In total, 193 surgical procedures were included. The success rate was 93.2%. The mean operative time was 128 minutes. The median interval from access placement to first cannulation was 21 days. The primary patency rates for BAT were 92.3%, 91.3%, 90.3%, 86.1%, and 71.9% at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The secondary patency rates for BAT were 96.3%, 96.3%, 95.0%, 90.1%, and 74.9% at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The primary patency rates for the whole access circuit were 61.4%, 49.2%, 45.8%, and 26.9% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The secondary patency rates for the whole access circuit were 85.1%, 83.3%, 82.0%, and 68.6% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The overall patient survival rates were 79.6%, 69.6%, 54.6%, 36.5%, and 13.4% at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. The abandonments of BAT were brachial artery thrombosis (n = 6), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), aneurysmal change (n = 1), and other reasons (n = 1). The abandonments of the whole access circuit were exhaustion of venous return (n = 26), abandonment of BAT (n = 7), and other reasons (n = 2). Complications were exhaustion of venous return (n = 26), aneurysmal change (n = 12), pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), brachial artery thrombosis (n = 7), impaired wound healing (n = 19), lymphorrhea (n = 9), skin infection (n = 5), hematoma on cannulation (n = 3), and reduced peripheral blood flow (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: The patency of BAT was excellent, and that of the whole access circuit was adequate, with a few complications. BAT is an effective alternative from a long-term perspective for patients who are unsuitable for conventional hemodialysis access creation.