Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a synthetic simulation model of endoscopic rectus sheath plication.
Rojas, María Fernanda; Torres, Javier; Figueroa, Úrsula; Varas, Julian; Achurra, Pablo; Navia, Alfonso; Cuadra, Álvaro; Searle, Susana.
Affiliation
  • Rojas MF; General Surgeon at Clínica Bupa Santiago, Vaticano 4008, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile. rd.mafe34@gmail.com.
  • Torres J; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon at Hospital Dr. Victor Ríos Ruiz, Los Angeles, Chile.
  • Figueroa Ú; Experimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Varas J; Experimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Achurra P; Experimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Navia A; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon at Pontificia, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Cuadra Á; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon at Pontificia, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Searle S; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon at Pontificia, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Hernia ; 28(4): 1381-1390, 2024 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767716
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Literature reviews outline minimally invasive approaches for abdominal diastasis in patients without skin excess. However, few surgeons are trained in endoscopic rectus sheath plication, and no simulated training programs exist for this method. This study aimed to develop and validate a synthetic simulation model for the training of skills in this approach under the Messick validity framework.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was carried out to assess the participants' previous level of laparoscopic/endoscopic skills by a questionnaire. Participants performed an endoscopic plication on the model and their performance was evaluated by one blinded observer using the global rating scale OSATS and a procedure specific checklist (PSC) scale. A 5-level Likert survey was applied to 5 experts and 4 plastic surgeons to assess Face and Content validity.

RESULTS:

Fifteen non-experts and 5 experts in abdominal wall endoscopic surgery were recruited. A median OSATS score [25 (range 24-25) vs 14 (range 5-22); p < 0.05 of maximum 25 points] and a median PSC score [11 (range 10-11) vs 8 (range 3-10); p < 0.05 of maximum 11 points] was significantly higher for experts compared with nonexperts. All experts agreed or strongly agreed that the model simulates a real scenario of endoscopic plication of the rectus sheath.

CONCLUSION:

Our simulation model met all validation criteria outlined in the Messick framework, demonstrating its ability to differentiate between experts and non-experts based on their baseline endoscopic surgical skills. This model stands as a valuable tool for evaluating skills in endoscopic rectus sheath plication.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Competence / Rectus Abdominis / Simulation Training Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Hernia Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Competence / Rectus Abdominis / Simulation Training Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Hernia Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: