Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A process evaluation of the NIDUS-Professional dementia training intervention for UK homecare workers.
Kelleher, Daniel; Windle, Karen; Randell, Rebecca; Lord, Kathryn; Duffy, Larisa; Akhtar, Amirah; Budgett, Jessica; Zabihi, Sedigheh; Banks, Sara; Rapaport, Penny; Lee, Teresa; Barber, Julie; Orgeta, Vasiliki; Manthorpe, Jill; Walters, Kate; Rockwood, Kenneth; Dow, Briony; Hoe, Juanita; Banerjee, Sube; Cooper, Claudia.
Affiliation
  • Kelleher D; Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
  • Windle K; Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
  • Randell R; Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
  • Lord K; Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
  • Duffy L; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Akhtar A; Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
  • Budgett J; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
  • Zabihi S; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
  • Banks S; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
  • Rapaport P; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Lee T; Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Barber J; Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Orgeta V; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Manthorpe J; The Policy Institute at King's, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Walters K; Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Rockwood K; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Dow B; National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Hoe J; Geller Institute of Ageing and Memory, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of West London, London, UK.
  • Banerjee S; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Cooper C; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Age Ageing ; 53(5)2024 05 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796316
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This process evaluation was conducted in parallel to the randomised controlled feasibility trial of NIDUS-Professional, a manualised remote dementia training intervention for homecare workers (HCWs), delivered alongside an individualised intervention for clients living with dementia and their family carers (NIDUS-Family). The process evaluation reports on (i) intervention reach, dose and fidelity; (ii) contexts influencing agency engagement and (iii) alignment of findings with theoretical assumptions about how the intervention might produce change.

METHODS:

We report proportions of eligible HCWs receiving any intervention (reach), number of sessions attended (dose; attending ≥4/6 main sessions was predefined as adhering), intervention fidelity and adherence of clients and carers to NIDUS-Family (attending all 6-8 planned sessions). We interviewed HCWs, managers, family carers and facilitators. We integrated and thematically analysed, at the homecare agency level, qualitative interview and intervention recording data.

RESULTS:

32/141 (23%) of eligible HCWs and 7/42 (17%) of family carers received any intervention; most who did adhered to the intervention (89% and 71%). Intervention fidelity was high. We analysed interviews with 20/44 HCWs, 3/4 managers and 3/7 family carers, as well as intervention recordings involving 32/44 HCWs. All agencies reported structural challenges in supporting intervention delivery. Agencies with greater management buy-in had higher dose and reach. HCWs valued NIDUS-Professional for enabling group reflection and peer support, providing practical, actionable care strategies and increasing their confidence as practitioners.

CONCLUSION:

NIDUS-Professional was valued by HCWs. Agency management, culture and priorities were key barriers to implementation; we discuss how to address these in a future trial.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Caregivers / Home Health Aides / Dementia / Home Care Services Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Age Ageing Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Caregivers / Home Health Aides / Dementia / Home Care Services Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Age Ageing Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: