Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Light exposure profiles differ between myopes and non-myopes outside school hours.
Dhakal, Rohit; Lawrenson, John G; Huntjens, Byki; Shah, Rakhee; Verkicharla, Pavan Kumar.
Affiliation
  • Dhakal R; Myopia Research Lab, Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre & Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sceinces, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
  • Lawrenson JG; Centre for Applied Vision Research, City University of London, London, UK.
  • Huntjens B; Centre for Applied Vision Research, City University of London, London, UK.
  • Shah R; Centre for Applied Vision Research, City University of London, London, UK.
  • Verkicharla PK; Centre for Applied Vision Research, City University of London, London, UK.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol ; 9(1)2024 May 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816010
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Considering the putative role of light in myopia, and variations in socioeconomic, lifestyle, educational and environmental factors across ethnicities, we objectively investigated light exposure patterns in Indian school children.

METHODS:

The light exposure profile of 143 school children (9-15 years, 50 myopes) recorded using a validated wearable light tracker for six continuous days was analysed. Additional data for non-school days were available for 87 children (26 myopes). The illuminance exposure levels, time spent outdoors and epoch (number of times participant is exposed to a predefined range of lux level per day) were compared between myopes and non-myopes across different light conditions ≥1000, ≥3000, ≥5000 and ≥10 000 lux. For school days, light exposure profiles during (1) before school, school and after school hours; and (2) class, break and transition (when a student travels to and from school) time were analysed.

RESULTS:

The overall median (IQR) daily illuminance exposure level, time spent outdoors and epochs at outdoors (≥1000 lux) were 807 (507-1079) lux/day, 46 (30-64) min/day and 9 (6-12) times/day, respectively. The daily illuminance exposure on non-school days was significantly higher in non-myopes than myopes (6369 (4508-9112) vs 5623 (2616-6929) lux/day, p=0.04). During transition time (school days), non-myopes had significantly higher illuminance exposure (910 (388-1479) vs 550 (263-1098) lux/day, p=0.04), spent more time outdoors (25 (10-43) vs 14 (4-29) min/day, p=0.01) and had higher outdoor epochs (6 (4-11) vs 5 (2-8) times/day, p=0.01) than myopes.

CONCLUSIONS:

A small but significant difference in illuminance exposure, time spent outdoors and epoch was noted between myopes and non-myopes during transition time, which may have implications in myopia control.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Schools / Myopia Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Schools / Myopia Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...