Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of an immunochromatographic test for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Li, Shu-Lian; Lin, Hui-Ling; Mi, Hong-Fei; Meng, Qing-Qi; Yan, Ya; Zhang, Xiao-Luo; Gu, Wei-Ming; Xiao, Yao.
Affiliation
  • Li SL; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xiamen Huli District Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Xiamen, China.
  • Lin HL; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Xiamen Huli District Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Xiamen, China.
  • Mi HF; Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, China.
  • Meng QQ; Center of Clinical Laboratory, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Yan Y; Center of Clinical Laboratory, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Zhang XL; Department of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Gu WM; Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Xiao Y; Department of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Pract Lab Med ; 40: e00412, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867761
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different brands of immunochromatographic test (ICT) reagents for Chlamydia trachomatis using homogenized samples to provide a reference for reagent quality control.

Methods:

Eight commercially available ICT reagents were evaluated, of which three used the latex method and five used the colloidal gold method. Analytical performance evaluation using a pure culture broth of C. trachomatis, as well as clinical application validation using cervical epithelial cell samples acquired from the research subjects, were conducted. The concentration of C. trachomatis was quantified using a nucleic acid amplification test.

Results:

The limit of detection (LOD) of different ICT reagents in the analytical performance evaluation varied from 9.5 × 103 to 1 × 105 IFU/mL, and only one reagent met the LOD specified in the manufacturer's instructions. Likewise, only one reagent in the clinical application validation achieved the analytical LOD, four reagents were 2.1-4.2-fold of the analytical LODs, and three reagents failed to detect positive results in clinical samples.

Conclusions:

The diagnostic performance of different methods and different brands of ICT reagents in clinical practice was different from the manufacturer's instructions and the results of laboratory evaluation. The diagnostic performance of reagents should be evaluated before they are actually used in clinical practice.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Pract Lab Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Pract Lab Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...