Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Use of Non-Person-First Language in Consecutive General Ophthalmology Referrals.
Leong, Rachel; Vosoughi, Amir; Sivakumar, Guhan; Micieli, Jonathan A.
Affiliation
  • Leong R; Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University (R.L.), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Vosoughi A; Health Sciences Centre Winnipeg (A.V.), Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Sivakumar G; Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo (G.S.), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Micieli JA; Kensington Eye Institute (J.A.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: jonathanmicieli@gmail.com.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 267: 1-7, 2024 Jun 18.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901721
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the prevalence of non-person-first language (PFL) in consecutive general ophthalmology referrals to a single tertiary ophthalmology clinic.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS:

Participants included Ophthalmology patients seen for their initial visit to a single tertiary ophthalmology clinic from July 2018 to December 2022. Ten randomly selected referrals from each day were screened for non-PFL as per the American Medical Association and American Psychological Association guidelines. Non-PFL was further categorized into general, diabetes, stigma, obesity, or ageism subcategories. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate associations between non-PFL use and referring provider gender and specialty, length of referral, and patient age and gender.

RESULTS:

A total of 2625 referrals were included in the study and 136 (5.2%) used non-PFL, such as referring to a person with diabetes as a "diabetic". Error types included Diabetes (38.2%), Stigma (30.9%), General (23.5%), Disability (8.8%), and Obesity (4.4%). Year of referral was predictive of non-PFL (P = .0016), with most occurring in 2020 (9.5%). Non-PFL was significantly more likely to occur in long length referrals compared to medium and short length referrals (16.2% vs. 5.1% vs. 3.5%, P < .001). Referring provider specialty was also predictive of non-PFL (P < .001) with most received by Family Medicine (8.3%), Optometry (4.4%), Emergency Medicine (0.62%), Ophthalmology (4.2%), Others (2.9%). Patient gender (P = .5563), patient age (P = .3466), and referring provider gender (P = .9057) were not predictive of non-PFL.

CONCLUSIONS:

Non-PFL use was most prevalent in 2020, with the most common referral sources being Family Medicine and Optometry. The highest proportions of non-PFL errors made were diabetes and stigma errors. Increased use of PFL in physician-physician communication can decrease intersectional stigma and promote inclusive patient care for ophthalmology patients.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: