Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and situational impact: A network analysis in Hong Kong residents.
Fong, Ted C T; Chang, Kay; Ho, Rainbow T H; Chio, Floria H N; Yip, Paul S F; Wen, Ming.
Affiliation
  • Fong TCT; Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: ttaatt@hku.hk.
  • Chang K; Department of Psychology, University of Macao, Taipa, Macau. Electronic address: kchang@um.edu.mo.
  • Ho RTH; Centre on Behavioral Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Social Work & Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: tinho@hku.hk.
  • Chio FHN; Department of Psychology, Trent University, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: floriachio@gmail.com.
  • Yip PSF; HKJC Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: sfpyip@hku.hk.
  • Wen M; Department of Sociology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. Electronic address: mingwen@hku.hk.
J Affect Disord ; 362: 152-160, 2024 Oct 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38945403
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 pandemic has had situational impacts and induced various psychological responses among residents. The present study aims to analyze the network structure of psychological responses to the pandemic and their relationships with situational impact, resilience, and well-being through a network approach.

METHODS:

An online survey recruited 1122 residents (mean age = 32.5 years, 65.4 % female) in Hong Kong from October 2020 to October 2021. The participants completed the Mental Impact and Distress Scale Psychological Response (MIDc-PR) and other validated measures. Gaussian graphical modeling was conducted in R to identify the central MIDc-PR symptoms and their bridge linkages with situational impact, resilience, and well-being.

RESULTS:

In the MIDc-PR network, the central symptoms were 'Routine' and 'Images' for Anticipation and 'Tense' and 'Lonely' for Modulation, with 12 bridge edges between the two clusters. In the combined network, the MIDc-PR nodes showed 12 bridge edges with situational impact, particularly in the health domain. 'Concerned', 'Sleep', and 'Lonely' showed negative linkages with resilience; 'Unmotivated' and 'Trapped' showed negative linkages with well-being. The network models showed good levels of stability and did not differ significantly in network structure and global strength across gender and age groups.

LIMITATIONS:

The cross-sectional study design only allowed undirected associations in the network and could not model the within-subject effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

The study findings contributed to the literature by elucidating the network structure of psychological responses to the pandemic. The central and bridge symptoms have clinical implications as potential targets for future interventions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Resilience, Psychological / COVID-19 Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: J Affect Disord Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Resilience, Psychological / COVID-19 Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: J Affect Disord Year: 2024 Document type: Article