Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
Krittanawong, Chayakrit; Rizwan, Affan; Khawaja, Muzamil; Newman, Noah; Escobar, Johao; Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan; Alam, Mahboob; Al-Azzam, Fu'ad; Yong, Celina M; Jneid, Hani.
Affiliation
  • Krittanawong C; Cardiology Division, NYU Langone Health and NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Chayakrit.Krittanawong@nyulangone.org.
  • Rizwan A; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Khawaja M; Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Newman N; Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Escobar J; Division of Cardiology, Harlem Cardiology, NY, 10035, USA.
  • Virk HUH; Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.
  • Alam M; Division of Cardiology, The Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Al-Azzam F; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Yong CM; VA Palo Alto Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford, University and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Palo AltoStanford, CACA, USA.
  • Jneid H; Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 2024 Jul 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985226
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. RECENT

FINDINGS:

Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: