Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is routine antibiotic prophylaxis warranted in dental implant surgery to prevent early implant failure? - a systematic review.
Momand, Palwasha; Naimi-Akbar, Aron; Hultin, Margareta; Lund, Bodil; Götrick, Bengt.
Affiliation
  • Momand P; Department of Orofacial Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, SE-20506, Sweden. Palwasha.momand@mau.se.
  • Naimi-Akbar A; Faculty of Odontology, Health Technology Assessment-Odontology (HTA-O), Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Hultin M; Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lund B; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Götrick B; Medical Unit of Plastic Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 842, 2024 Jul 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054434
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The question of whether antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered routinely for dental implant surgery is unresolved. Despite the lack of conclusive supportive evidence, antibiotics are often administered to reduce the risk of infection, which could lead to early implant failure. Increasing antibiotic resistance is a major concern and it is therefore important to reduce the overall use of antibiotics, including in dentistry. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative antibiotics in preventing early implant failure, in overall healthy patients undergoing dental implant surgery.

METHODS:

An electronic search was undertaken of PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to October 1st, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs). All RCTs comparing antibiotic prophylaxis with no antibiotics/placebo in overall healthy patients receiving dental implants were included. The primary outcome was patients with early implant failure. Risk of bias was assessed, data were extracted, a meta-analysis was done, and GRADE certainty-of-evidence ratings were determined. The risk ratio (RR), the risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.

RESULTS:

After removal of duplicates, 1086 abstracts were screened, and 17 articles were reviewed in full text. Seven RCTs with moderate or low risk of bias and with a total of 1859 patients and 3014 implants were included in the meta-analysis. With reference to early implant failure at patient level, the meta-analysis failed to disclose any statistically significant difference (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30-1.47) between antibiotic prophylaxis and a placebo. The risk difference was -0.007 (95% CI -0.035-0.020) leading to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 143.

CONCLUSION:

Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental implant surgery does not seem to have any substantial effect on early implant failure ( ). The results do not support routine antibiotic prophylaxis for dental implant surgery.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Dental Restoration Failure Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Oral Health Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Dental Restoration Failure Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Oral Health Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: