Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with better short-term survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Duan, Xiaofeng; Zhao, Fangdong; Shang, Xiaobin; Yue, Jie; Chen, Chuangui; Ma, Zhao; Chen, Zuoyu; Zhang, Chen; Pang, Qingsong; Zhang, Wencheng; Abbas, Abbas E; Jiang, Hongjing.
Affiliation
  • Duan X; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhao F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Shang X; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
  • Yue J; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
  • Chen C; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
  • Ma Z; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
  • Chen Z; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhang C; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
  • Pang Q; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhang W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Abbas AE; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Lifespan Health System, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  • Jiang H; Department of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Cancer Med ; 13(15): e70113, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136674
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination is currently the primary strategy to treat metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) is being intensively investigated for treating locally advanced ESCC.

OBJECTIVE:

We compared the efficacy and safety of NCIT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to treat locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS:

We included 214 locally advanced ESCC patients who were administered neoadjuvant therapy from May 2014 to April 2022. The patients were grouped according to two neoadjuvant protocols (NCIT and NCRT) routinely used at our institution. Perioperative findings, pathological results, and survival data were compared between the two groups by conducting unmatched and 11 propensity score matching (PSM) analyses.

RESULTS:

Following 11 PSM analysis of the confounders, 66 patients were allocated to each of the two groups. Time span between neoadjuvant therapy completion and esophagectomy was significantly longer after NCRT than that after NCIT (47.1 ± 13.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 8.8 days; p < 0.001). The NCIT group exhibited significantly greater number of harvested lymph nodes than the NCRT group (33.6 ± 12.7 vs. 21.7 ± 10.2; p < 0.001). The pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were similar between the two groups [NCIT group 25.8% (17/66) and 62.1% (41/66), respectively; NCRT group 27.3% (18/66) and 56.1% (37/66), respectively (p > 0.05)]. The overall incidence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, or postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 2-year cumulative overall survival rates and the 2-year disease-free survival rates of the NCIT and NCRT groups were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively (p = 0.029) and 70.0% and 50.8%, respectively (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION:

In locally advanced ESCC patients, short-term survival after NCIT is superior to that after NCRT, with similar perioperative and pathological outcomes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophagectomy / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Cancer Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophagectomy / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Cancer Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: