Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep and Superficial Debridement Techniques in Lower Extremity Split-thickness Skin Grafting.
Rohrich, Rachel N; Li, Karen R; Lava, Christian X; Alahmadi, Sami; Stanton, Henry L; Kim, Victoria H; Spoer, Daisy L; Evans, Karen K; Steinberg, John S; Attinger, Christopher E.
Affiliation
  • Rohrich RN; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
  • Li KR; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
  • Lava CX; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
  • Alahmadi S; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
  • Stanton HL; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
  • Kim VH; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
  • Spoer DL; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
  • Evans KK; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
  • Steinberg JS; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
  • Attinger CE; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 12(8): e6048, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139839
ABSTRACT

Background:

Patients with nonhealing lower extremity (LE) wounds often require a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) for closure. Nonviable tissue must be debrided before STSG inset. Our study aimed to compare differences in debridement depth on STSG outcomes.

Methods:

Chronic, atraumatic LE wounds receiving STSG from December 2014 to December 2022 at a single institution were reviewed. Demographics, wound characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were collected. Superficially debrided wounds were compared with wounds receiving deep debridement (DD), defined by debriding to the level of white tissue underlying the granulation tissue. Subanalysis was performed on wounds that had a negative and positive postdebridement culture. Primary outcome was graft failure.

Results:

Overall, 244 wounds in 168 patients were identified. In total, 158 (64.8%) wounds were superficially debrided and 86 (35.3%) received DD. The cohort had a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 3]. Diabetes (56.6%) and peripheral artery disease (36.9%) were prevalent. The only statically significant demographic difference between groups was congestive heart failure (SD 14.9% versus DD 3.0%, P = 0.017). Wound size, depth, and all microbiology results were similar between groups. Postoperatively, the DD group demonstrated significantly less graft failure (10.5% versus 22.2%, P = 0.023). In a multivariate regression, DD was independently associated with lower odds of graft failure (OR 0.0; CI, 0.0-0.8; P = 0.034). Sub-analysis of graft failure supported this finding in culture-positive wounds (DD 7.6% versus DD 22.1%, P = 0.018) but not in culture-negative wounds (13.6% versus 22.2%, P = 0.507).

Conclusions:

The DD technique demonstrates improved outcomes in chronic, culture-positive LE wounds receiving STSG.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article