Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A study of patients' choice of medical treatment based on rational choice theory: a cross-sectional survey from China.
Li, Jin; Zhao, Ning; Gu, Mei; Li, Danhui; Yang, Jia.
Affiliation
  • Li J; Hospital Office, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangdong, 518033, China.
  • Zhao N; School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
  • Gu M; School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
  • Li D; Medical Department, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Shaanxi, 710068, China.
  • Yang J; School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Fam Pract ; 2024 Aug 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39162137
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe how patients choose between primary care institutions (PCIs) and non-PCIs using rational choice theory from the perspective of survival rationality, economic rationality, and social rationality.

METHODS:

Multi-stage stratified sampling and convenience sampling were applied to select 1723 patients to conduct the questionnaire survey. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were performed to analyze the factors associated with patients' choice of PCIs.

RESULTS:

In total 55.83% of 1723 patients would attend a PCIs for healthcare. The results of the univariate analysis revealed that patients who are female (58.46%, P = .015), suffering from chronic diseases (56.26%, P = .047), inpatients (67.58%, P < .001), Beijing (59.62%, P = .002), partial understanding of the family doctor contracting system (62.30%, P < .001), and not understanding of the medical alliance policy (58.04%, P = .031) had significantly higher probability of choosing PCIs. Logistic regression analysis showed that females were more unwilling to attend PCIs (odds ratio (OR) = 0.822, 95%CI 0.676-0.999). Following survival rationality, patients without chronic diseases were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.834, 95%CI 1.029-3.268), and inpatients were more unlikely to attend PCIs (OR = 0.581, 95%CI 0.437-0.774). From an economic rationality perspective, patients from the Fujian province were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.424, 95%CI 1.081-1.876). From a social rationality perspective, patients who partial understanding of the family doctor contracting system were more unlikely to attend PCIs (OR = 0.701, 95%CI 0.551-0.892), and patients who partial and complete understanding of the medical alliance policy were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.340, 95%CI 1.064-1.687; OR = 1.485, 95%CI 1.086-2.030).

CONCLUSIONS:

Survival, economic, and social rationality are involved in patients' choice to attend PCIs. Compared to survival rationality and social rationality, economic rationality showed a lower association with patients' choice to attend PCIs. Medical institutions are recommended to adopt a "patient health-centered" approach when providing medical services and further optimize the family doctor contracting system and construction of medical alliances.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Fam Pract Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Fam Pract Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: