Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the Impact of Gender and Race on Otolaryngology Resident Experiences Across the United States.
Lodha, Shweta; Luzum, Nathan; Washabaugh, Claire; Allen, Ariana; Stinnett, Sandra; Woodard, Charles; Fekrat, Sharon.
Affiliation
  • Lodha S; Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Luzum N; Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Washabaugh C; Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Allen A; Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Stinnett S; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Woodard C; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Fekrat S; Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224039
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Otolaryngology residents often encounter work-related stress and challenges during training. Sociodemographic factors influence experiences during residency; however, the impact of race and gender on otolaryngology trainee well-being during residency remains understudied. STUDY

DESIGN:

Online survey.

SETTING:

US residency programs.

METHODS:

An anonymous online survey consisting of 59 multiple-choice questions was sent to 104 directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education otolaryngology residency programs to distribute to residents. Respondents were queried regarding demographics and experiences with bias. Residents self-identified gender and race. Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Middle Eastern/North African, and multiracial residents were categorized as underrepresented minorities (URM).

RESULTS:

Sixty-one US otolaryngology residents responded to the survey, the majority of whom were women (60.7%) and white (62%). Many residents endorsed a belief that receipt of research and training opportunities was negatively impacted by bias due to race (29.5%) or gender (45.9%). More women (27%) than men (13%) reported maximal burnout, and fewer men (17.4%) than women (40.5%) expressed low confidence in ability to independently care for patients. More male (47.8%) and white (31.6%) residents strongly agreed they were thriving. 94.6% of women and 33.3% of URM residents reported being mistaken for a nonphysician, compared to 0% of white male respondents.

CONCLUSION:

Otolaryngology residents perceived differential treatment based on race and gender, with women and URM residents experiencing greater exclusion and bias, as well as increased misidentification and decreased ability to thrive. Future work includes increasing sample size for generalizability and developing interventions that uphold equity in residency training environments.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg / Otolaryngol. head neck surg / Otolaryngology - Head and neck surgery Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg / Otolaryngol. head neck surg / Otolaryngology - Head and neck surgery Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: