Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cerclage suture type to prevent pregnancy loss in women requiring a vaginal cervical cerclage: the C-STICH RCT.
Hodgetts Morton, Victoria; Moakes, Catherine A; Daniels, Jane; Middleton, Lee; Shennan, Andrew; Brocklehurst, Peter; Israfil-Bayli, Fidan; Ewer, Andrew K; Gray, James; Simpson, Nigel Ab; Norman, Jane E; Lees, Christoph; Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos; Stubbs, Clive; Hughes, Max; Morris, R Katie; Toozs-Hobson, Philip.
Affiliation
  • Hodgetts Morton V; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Moakes CA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Daniels J; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Middleton L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Shennan A; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Brocklehurst P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Israfil-Bayli F; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Ewer AK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Gray J; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Simpson NA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Norman JE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Lees C; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Tryposkiadis K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Stubbs C; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hughes M; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Morris RK; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
  • Toozs-Hobson P; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Health Technol Assess ; 28(40): 1-44, 2024 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39239933
ABSTRACT

Background:

Second trimester miscarriage and preterm birth is a significant global problem. Surgical cervical cerclage is performed to prevent pregnancy loss and preterm birth. It utilises either a monofilament or braided suture. It is hypothesised that a braided material becomes colonised with pathogenic bacteria that causes vaginal dysbiosis, infection and cerclage failure.

Objectives:

The primary objective of the study was to examine the effectiveness of using a monofilament suture material as opposed to a braided suture material on pregnancy loss in women requiring a vaginal cervical cerclage.

Design:

Superiority open randomised controlled trial.

Setting:

Seventy-five maternity sites across the UK.

Participants:

Women experiencing a singleton pregnancy requiring a cervical cerclage.

Interventions:

Monofilament suture or braided suture. Main outcome

measures:

The primary outcome was pregnancy loss (miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life). Secondary outcomes included the core outcome set for preterm birth.

Methods:

Women were randomised on a 1 1 basis to monofilament or braided cerclage utilising a bespoke randomisation service with minimisation dependent on the site, indication for cerclage, intention to use progesterone and planned surgical technique. The inclusion criteria were three or more previous mid-trimester losses or preterm births, insertion of a cerclage in a previous pregnancy, a history of a mid-trimester loss or preterm birth with a shortened cervical length in the current pregnancy or in women who clinicians deemed at risk of preterm birth. The exclusion criteria were an emergency or rescue cerclage, age of < 18 years, being unable to give informed consent or the cerclage having to be placed abdominally. The original sample size was calculated based on a relative risk reduction of 41% from a pregnancy loss rate of 19% in the braided group to 11% in the monofilament group with 90% power and alpha at p = 0.05. The independent data monitoring committee noted a lower-than-anticipated pooled event rate within the trial and recommended an increase in sample size to 2050. The outcome data were collected using clinical record forms from the maternal and neonatal medical records and reported to Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit.

Results:

A total of 2049 women were randomised, after withdrawals and loss to follow-up, data on 1005 women in the monofilament group and 993 women in the braided group were included. The baseline demographics between the groups were similar. There was no evidence of a difference in pregnancy loss rates between the monofilament and braided groups (80/1003 vs. 75/993; adjusted risk ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.40; adjusted risk difference 0.002, 95% confidence interval -0.02 to 0.03).

Limitations:

The trial did not collect long-term paediatric outcomes. There were no safety concerns.

Conclusions:

There was no evidence of a difference in pregnancy loss between a monofilament suture and a braided suture. Future work Long-term follow-up of neonates born within the C-STICH (cerclage suture type for an insufficient cervix and its effects on health outcomes) trial. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN15373349.

Funding:

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref 13/04/107) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 40. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Cervical cerclage is an operation performed in pregnancy to prevent miscarriage and preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is sometimes recommended in women who have had babies born prematurely before or who have had previous cervical surgery. A cerclage operation involves a stitch being inserted around the neck of the womb (cervix) to keep it closed during pregnancy and to prevent it opening prematurely. When performing the operation, the doctor can use different types of threads made of different materials. The threads used to perform the operation are called sutures. One suture type is a single strand or monofilament thread, and the other is a multifilament braided thread with lots of thin strands woven together. Some evidence has suggested that using a monofilament suture thread prevented pregnancy loss by preventing infection. Therefore, we performed a randomised controlled trial of the use of monofilament suture thread versus braided suture thread, aiming to reduce pregnancy loss in women who were having a cerclage as part of their routine care. The women consented to take part in the study and were randomly allocated to their cerclage performed with either a monofilament or braided suture thread; there was no other change to their planned pregnancy care. What happened in their pregnancy was recorded from their medical records and analysed. A total of 2049 women agreed to take part in the study and consented to the analysis of their pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Cerclage suture type for an insufficient cervix and its effects on health outcomes showed that there was no difference in pregnancy loss between the two suture threads. There was decreased maternal sepsis and decreased chorioamnionitis (which is an infection inside the womb during labour) in the women who received a monofilament suture, which needs further investigation. Although more women who had a cerclage using the monofilament thread needed a small operation and an anaesthetic, often between 36 and 37 weeks, to remove the monofilament suture prior to a vaginal birth, there were no differences in the outcomes for their babies.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Spontaneous / Cerclage, Cervical / Premature Birth Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Health Technol Assess / Health technol. assess. (Winch.) / Health technology assessment (Winchester) Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / TECNOLOGIA MEDICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Spontaneous / Cerclage, Cervical / Premature Birth Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Health Technol Assess / Health technol. assess. (Winch.) / Health technology assessment (Winchester) Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / TECNOLOGIA MEDICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: