Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH)
Christopher A Martin; Daniel Pan; Joshua Nazareth; Avinash Aujayeb; Luke Bryant; Sue Carr; Laura J Gray; Bindu Gregary; Amit Gupta; Anna Louise Guyatt; Alan Gopal; Thomas Hine; Catherine John; Ian Christopher McManus; Carl Melbourne; Laura B Nellums; Rubina Reza; Sandra Simpson; Martin D Tobin; Katherine Woolf; Stephen Zingwe; Kamlesh Khunti; Manish Pareek; - the UK-REACH Study Collaborative Group.
Affiliation
  • Christopher A Martin; University of Leicester
  • Daniel Pan; University of Leicester
  • Joshua Nazareth; University of Leicester
  • Avinash Aujayeb; Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital
  • Luke Bryant; University of Leicester
  • Sue Carr; University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
  • Laura J Gray; University of Leicester
  • Bindu Gregary; Royal Preston Hospital
  • Amit Gupta; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Anna Louise Guyatt; University of Leicester
  • Alan Gopal; Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Thomas Hine; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Catherine John; University of Leicester
  • Ian Christopher McManus; University College London
  • Carl Melbourne; University of Leicester
  • Laura B Nellums; University of Nottingham
  • Rubina Reza; Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
  • Sandra Simpson; Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
  • Martin D Tobin; University of Leicester
  • Katherine Woolf; University College London
  • Stephen Zingwe; Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
  • Kamlesh Khunti; University of Leicester
  • Manish Pareek; University of Leicester
  • - the UK-REACH Study Collaborative Group;
Preprint in En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21263629
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence and predictors of self-reported access to appropriate personal protective equipment (aPPE) for healthcare workers (HCWs) in the United Kingdom (UK) during the first UK national COVID-19 lockdown (March 2020) and at the time of questionnaire response (December 2020 - February 2021). DesignTwo cross sectional analyses using data from a questionnaire-based cohort study. SettingNationwide questionnaire from 4th December 2020 to 28th February 2021. ParticipantsA representative sample of HCWs or ancillary workers in a UK healthcare setting aged 16 or over, registered with one of seven main UK healthcare regulatory bodies. Main outcome measureBinary measure of self-reported aPPE (access all of the time vs access most of the time or less frequently) at two timepoints the first national lockdown in the UK (primary analysis) and at the time of questionnaire response (secondary analysis). Results10,508 HCWs were included in the primary analysis, and 12,252 in the secondary analysis. 3702 (35.2%) of HCWs reported aPPE at all times in the primary analysis; 6806 (83.9%) reported aPPE at all times in the secondary analysis. After adjustment (for age, sex, ethnicity, migration status, occupation, aerosol generating procedure exposure, work sector, work region, working hours, night shift frequency and trust in employing organisation), older HCWs (per decade increase in age aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.16-1.26, p<0.001) and those working in Intensive Care Units (1.61, 1.38 - 1.89, p<0.001) were more likely to report aPPE at all times. Those from Asian ethnic groups compared to White (0.77, 0.67-0.89, p<0.001), those in allied health professional (AHPs) and dental roles (vs those in medical roles; AHPs 0.77, 0.68 - 0.87, p<0.001; dental 0.63, 0.49-0.81, p<0.001), and those who saw a higher number of COVID-19 patients compared to those who saw none ([≥]21 patients 0.74, 0.61-0.90, p=0.003) were less likely to report aPPE at all times in the primary analysis. aPPE at all times was also not uniform across UK regions (reported access being better in South West and North East England than London). Those who trusted their employing organisation to deal with concerns about unsafe clinical practice, compared to those who did not, were twice as likely to report aPPE at all times (2.18, 1.97-2.40, p<0.001). With the exception of occupation, these factors were also significantly associated with aPPE at all times in the secondary analysis. ConclusionsWe found that only a third of HCWs in the UK reported aPPE at all times during the period of the first lockdown and that aPPE had improved later in the pandemic. We also identified key sociodemographic and occupational determinants of aPPE during the first UK lockdown, the majority of which have persisted since lockdown was eased. These findings have important public health implications for HCWs, particularly as cases of infection and long-COVID continue to rise in the UK. Trial registrationISRCTN 11811602 What is already known on this topicAccess to personal protective equipment (PPE) is crucial to protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from infection. Limited data exist concerning the prevalence of, and factors relating to, PPE access for HCWs in the United Kingdom (UK) during the COVID-19 pandemic. What this study addsOnly a third of HCWs reported having access to appropriate PPE all of the time during the first UK national lockdown. Older HCWs, those working in Intensive Care Units and those who trusted their employing organisation to deal with concerns about unsafe clinical practice, were more likely to report access to adequate PPE. Those from Asian ethnic groups (compared to White ethnic groups) and those who saw a high number of COVID-19 were less likely to report access to adequate PPE. Our findings have important implications for the mental and physical health of HCWs working during the pandemic in the UK.
License
cc_by
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Cohort_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Language: En Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Cohort_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Language: En Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
...