Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions
Acta cir. bras
; 32(2): 98-107, Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo
em Inglês
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-837681
Biblioteca responsável:
BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract Purpose:
To compare the polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) to Vicryl®, Parietex composite® and Ultrapro® meshes to assess the occurrence of adhesions in the intraperitoneal implantation.Methods:
Sixty Wistar rats were allocated into three groups PP+V, in which all the animals received a polypropylene and a Vicryl® mesh; PP+PC, with the implantation of polypropylene and Parietex composite® meshes and PP+UP, in which there was implantation of polypropylene and Ultrapro®. Macroscopic analysis was performed 28 days later to assess the percentage of mesh area affected by adhesion.Results:
in the PP+ V group, the Vicryl® mesh showed lower adhesion formation (p=0.013). In the PP+PC, there were no differences between polypropylene and Parietex composite® (p=0.765). In the PP+UP group, Ultrapro® and polypropylene meshes were equivalent (p=0.198) .Conclusion:
All the four meshes led to adhesions, with the Vicryl® mesh showing the least potential for its formation.
Texto completo:
Disponível
Coleções:
Bases de dados internacionais
Base de dados:
LILACS
Assunto principal:
Poliésteres
/
Poliglactina 910
/
Polipropilenos
/
Telas Cirúrgicas
/
Aderências Teciduais
/
Colágeno
/
Hérnia Ventral
Limite:
Animais
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Acta cir. bras
Assunto da revista:
CIRURGIA GERAL
/
Procedimentos Cir£rgicos Operat¢rios
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
País de afiliação:
Brasil
Instituição/País de afiliação:
Universidade Federal do Paraná/BR