Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: A systematic review
Sánchez-Torres, Alba; Sánchez-Garcés, M Ángeles; Gay-Escoda, Cosme.
Afiliação
  • Sánchez-Torres, Alba; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry. Dentistry Student. Barcelona. Spain
  • Sánchez-Garcés, M Ángeles; University of Barcelona. School of Dentistry. Barcelona. Spain
  • Gay-Escoda, Cosme; Teknon Medical Center. Implantology and Maxillofacial Surgery Department. Barcelona. Spain
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 19(4): e419-e425, jul. 2014. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-124807
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Analyse the effectiveness of different materials and techniques used in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) applied in periapical surgery, comparing the success rate obtained in 4-wall defects and in through-and-through bone lesions as well as to establish prognostic factors. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A Cochrane, PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus database search (October 2012 to March 2013) was conducted with the search terms "periapical surgery", "surgical endodontic treatment", "guided tissue regeneration", "bone regeneration", "bone grafts", "barrier membranes" and "periapical lesions" individually and next, using the Boolean operator "AND". The inclusion criteria were the use of GTR (bone graft and/or membrane barrier), clinical studies including at least 10 patients, 10 years aged articles published in English or French. The exclusion criteria were case reports and nonhuman studies.

RESULTS:

34 publications were selected from a total of 483. 9 of the 34 were excluded. Finally, the systematic review included 25 articles 2 metaanalysis, 8 reviews, 13 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. They were stratified according to their level of scientific evidence using the SORT criteria. The 4-wall periapical and through-and-through lesions improve more their prognosis by combining bone grafts and barrier membranes than using these materials exclusively, respect to the control groups. The results show lower failure rates in in 4-wall le-sions than in through-and-through lesions using GTR.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combined GTR technique (filling material and membranes) obtains a greater success rate both in 4-wall lesions and in through-and-through lesions, respect to the control groups. The use of regeneration materials seems to be more necessary in through-and-through lesions, > 5mm lesions, lower teeth and apicomarginal lesions as they have the worst healing prognosis. In function of the articles scientific quality, a type B recommendation is given in favour to the use of GTR in association of periapical surgery in case of 4-wall and through-and-through lesions
RESUMEN
No disponible
Assuntos

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Periodontite Periapical / Tecido Periapical / Regeneração Óssea Tipo de estudo: Guia de prática clínica / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco / Revisão sistemática Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Teknon Medical Center/Spain / University of Barcelona/Spain

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Periodontite Periapical / Tecido Periapical / Regeneração Óssea Tipo de estudo: Guia de prática clínica / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco / Revisão sistemática Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Teknon Medical Center/Spain / University of Barcelona/Spain
...