Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of esophageal motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease with and without globus sensation
Tang, Yuming; Huang, Jia; Zhu, Ying; Qian, Aihua; Xu, Bin; Yao, Weiyan.
Afiliação
  • Tang, Yuming; Ruijin Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Shanghai. China
  • Huang, Jia; Ruijin Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Shanghai. China
  • Zhu, Ying; Ruijin Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Shanghai. China
  • Qian, Aihua; Ruijin Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Shanghai. China
  • Xu, Bin; Ruijin Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Shanghai. China
  • Yao, Weiyan; Ruijin Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology. Shanghai. China
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 109(12): 850-855, dic. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-169193
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT
Backgrounds and

aims:

This study aimed to compare the esophageal motility between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with typical symptoms but without globus sensation and GERD patients only with globus symptoms.

Methods:

A total of 57 consecutive GERD patients diagnosed by endoscopy or by 24-hour pH monitoring between May 2013 and September 2015 were included retrospectively into the study. The patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of globus. Thirty patients presented with typical reflux symptoms but without globus were assigned to the typical GERD group and 27 patients only with globus symptom were assigned to the globus GERD group. All patients underwent esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) and the differences in esophageal motility between the two groups were analyzed.

Results:

The globus GERD group showed a significantly greater lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length, LES basal pressure and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) residual pressure than that of the typical GERD group (3.47 ± 0.76 vs 2.65 ± 0.62 cm, 21.71 ± 9.68 vs 16.04 ± 8.49 mmHg, 7.30 ± 4.42 vs 4.12 ± 2.92 mmHg, all p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the distal wave amplitude, mean wave duration, distal contractile integral (DCI), contractile front velocity (CFV), distal latency (DL), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and UES basal pressure. The incidence of esophageal dysmotility in the globus GERD group (33.3%) was higher than in the typical GERD group (23.3%). There was no significant difference in esophageal acid exposure of the non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients between the two groups.

Conclusions:

Globus GERD patients have a higher UES residual pressure, longer LES length, higher LES basal pressure and greater esophageal dysmotility than typical GERD patients. HRM is useful in evaluating esophageal motility of GERD patients (AU)
RESUMEN
No disponible
Assuntos

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica / Refluxo Gastroesofágico / Transtornos das Sensações Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Fatores de risco Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Rev. esp. enferm. dig Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Ruijin Hospital/China

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica / Refluxo Gastroesofágico / Transtornos das Sensações Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Fatores de risco Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Rev. esp. enferm. dig Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Ruijin Hospital/China
...