Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with microscopic residual tumor after curative resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Lee, J; Kang, SH; Noh, OK; Chun, M; Oh, YT; Kim, BW; Kim, SW.
Afiliação
  • Lee, J; Korea University College of Medicine. Anam Hospital. Department of Surgery. Seoul. Republic of Korea
  • Kang, SH; Inje University School of Medicine. Haeundae Paik Hospital. Busan. Republic of Korea
  • Noh, OK; Ajou University School of Medicine. Department of Biomedical Informatics. Suwon. Republic of Korea
  • Chun, M; Ajou University School of Medicine. Department of Radiation Oncology. Suwon. Republic of Korea
  • Oh, YT; Ajou University School of Medicine. Department of Radiation Oncology. Suwon. Republic of Korea
  • Kim, BW; Ajou University School of Medicine. Department of Surgery. Suwon. Republic of Korea
  • Kim, SW; Konyang University College of Medicine. Department of Radiation Oncology. Daejeon. Republic of Korea
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(8): 1011-1017, ago. 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-173684
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

We investigated the role of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) in patients with a microscopically positive resection margin (R1) after curative resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). Methods/patients A total of 84 patients treated with curative resection for EHCC were included. Fifty-two patients with negative resection margins did not receive any adjuvant treatments (R0 + S group). The remaining 32 patients with microscopically positive resection margins received either adjuvant CCRT (R1 + CCRT group, n = 19) or adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) alone (R1 + RT group, n = 13).

Results:

During the median follow-up period of 26 months, the 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival rates (OS) were 81.8, 62.6, and 61.5% for R0 + S group; 71.8, 57.8, and 57.9% for R1 + CCRT group; and 16.8, 9.6, and 15.4% for R1 + RT group, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the R1 + CCRT group did not show any significant difference in survival rates compared with the R0 + S group. The R1 + RT group had lower LRRFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.008; p = 0.044], DFS (HR 2.364; p = 0.022), and OS (HR 2.417; p = 0.011) when compared with the R0 + S and R1 + CCRT group.

Conclusions:

A lack of significant survival difference between R0 + S group and R1 + CCRT group suggests that adjuvant CCRT ameliorates the negative effect of microscopic positive resection margin. In contrast, adjuvant RT alone is appeared to be inadequate for controlling microscopically residual tumor
RESUMEN
No disponible
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares / Colangiocarcinoma / Neoplasia Residual / Quimiorradioterapia Limite: Adulto / Idoso / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Ajou University School of Medicine/Republic of Korea / Inje University School of Medicine/Republic of Korea / Konyang University College of Medicine/Republic of Korea / Korea University College of Medicine/Republic of Korea
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares / Colangiocarcinoma / Neoplasia Residual / Quimiorradioterapia Limite: Adulto / Idoso / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Ajou University School of Medicine/Republic of Korea / Inje University School of Medicine/Republic of Korea / Konyang University College of Medicine/Republic of Korea / Korea University College of Medicine/Republic of Korea
...