Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of aerosol therapy in children during noninvasive ventilation with helmet and total face mask / Seguridad de la aerosolterapia durante la ventilación mecánica no invasiva con helmet y mascarilla facial total en población pediátrica
Rodriguez Garcia, L; Medina, A; Modesto i Alapont, V; Palacios Loro, ML; Mayordomo-Colunga, J; Vivanco-Allende, A; Rey, C.
Afiliação
  • Rodriguez Garcia, L; Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León. Department of Paediatrics. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. León. Spain
  • Medina, A; Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Department of Paediatrics. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Oviedo. Spain
  • Modesto i Alapont, V; Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care. Valencia. Spain
  • Palacios Loro, ML; Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Department of Paediatrics. Oviedo. Spain
  • Mayordomo-Colunga, J; Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Department of Paediatrics. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Oviedo. Spain
  • Vivanco-Allende, A; Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Department of Paediatrics. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Oviedo. Spain
  • Rey, C; Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Oviedo. Spain
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 43(8): 474-479, nov. 2019. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-185884
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To evaluate the consequences of using nebulized drugs in patients subjected to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with total face mask (TFM) and helmet.

Design:

A descriptive analytical study of a prospective patient cohort was carried out. Ambit Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary hospital. Patients Consecutive sampling was used to include all patients admitted to the PICU and requiring NIV with helmet or TFM over a period of 29 months. No patients were excluded.

Interventions:

Nebulized treatment was added according to medical criteria. Variables of interest Independent variables were age, sex, diagnosis, disease severity, ventilation parameters and nebulized drugs (if administered). Secondary outcomes were duration and failure of NIV, and length of PICU stay.

Results:

The most frequent diagnoses were bronchiolitis (60.5%) and asthma (23%). Patients received NIV for a median of 43h. Nebulized drugs were administered in 40% of the cases during NIV, and no adverse effects were registered. Using Bayesian statistics, the calculated probability of suffering an adverse effect was 1.3% with helmet and 0.5% with TFM (high density 95% probability intervals). Patients with helmet and nebulized therapy were in more serious condition than those who did not receive nebulization; nevertheless, no differences were observed regarding the need to change to bilevel modality. With TFM, PICU stay was shorter for the same degree of severity (p=0.033), and the NIV failure rate was higher in patients who did not receive inhaled drugs (p=0.024).

Conclusions:

The probability of suffering an adverse effect related to nebulization is extremely low when using a helmet or TFM. Inhaled therapy with TFM may shorten PICU stay in some patients
RESUMEN

Objetivo:

Evaluar las consecuencias de la medicación nebulizada en pacientes con ventilación no invasiva (VNI) con mascarilla facial total (MFT) y casco.

Diseño:

Estudio analítico descriptivo sobre una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes. Ámbito UCIP de hospital de tercer nivel. Pacientes Todos los pacientes ingresados en UCIP (muestreo consecutivo) con VNI con casco o MFT durante 29 meses. No se excluyeron pacientes. Intervenciones Se añadió tratamiento nebulizado según criterio médico. Variables de interés Independientes edad, sexo, diagnóstico, gravedad, parámetros ventilatorios y medicación nebulizada (si se utilizaba). Secundarias duración, fallo de VNI y estancia en UCIP.

Resultados:

Los diagnósticos más frecuentes fueron bronquiolitis (60,5%) y asma (23%). La mediana de conexión a VNI fue de 43 horas. Se administraron nebulizaciones durante la VNI en un 40% sin registrarse efectos adversos. La probabilidad calculada de tener un efecto adverso fue 1,3% con casco y 0,5% con MFT (estadística bayesiana, intervalo de probabilidad 95%). Los pacientes con casco y aerosolterapia tenían mayor gravedad que los que no recibieron nebulizaciones, sin encontrarse diferencias en la necesidad de cambiar a modalidad con doble nivel de presión. En los pacientes con MFT la estancia en UCIP fue menor (p=0,033) a pesar de no existir diferencias en el nivel de gravedad; la tasa de fallo de VNI fue mayor en los que no recibieron nebulizaciones (p=0,024).

Conclusiones:

La probabilidad de tener un efecto adverso relacionado con la nebulización es baja utilizando casco o MFT. La terapia inhalada con MFT puede disminuir la estancia en UCIP en algunos pacientes
Assuntos

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Aerossóis / Máscaras Faciais / Segurança do Paciente Limite: Criança, pré-escolar / Humanos / Lactente Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León/Spain / Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe/Spain / Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias/Spain

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Aerossóis / Máscaras Faciais / Segurança do Paciente Limite: Criança, pré-escolar / Humanos / Lactente Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León/Spain / Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe/Spain / Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias/Spain
...