Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs
Camps-Font, Octavi; González-Barnadas, Albert; Mir-Mari, Javier; Figueiredo, Rui; Gay-Escoda, Cosme; Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard.
Afiliação
  • Camps-Font, Octavi; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Oral Surgery and implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • González-Barnadas, Albert; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Oral Surgery and implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • Mir-Mari, Javier; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Oral Surgery and implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • Figueiredo, Rui; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Oral Surgery and implantology. Barcelona. Spain
  • Gay-Escoda, Cosme; Efhre International University. Faculty of Medicine. Oral Surgery and implantology. Belize City. Belize
  • Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard; University of Barcelona. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Oral Surgery and implantology. Barcelona. Spain
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 25(5): e691-e699, sept. 2020. tab, graf, ilus
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-196526
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To assess the effect of implantoplasty and implant-abutment design on the fracture resistance and macroscopic morphology of narrow-diameter (3.5 mm) dental implants. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

SCREW-shaped titanium dental implants (n = 48) were studied in vitro. Three groups (n = 16) were established, based on implant-abutment connection type external hexagon, internal hexagon and conical. Eight implants from each group were subjected to an implantoplasty procedure; the remaining 8 implants served as controls. Implant wall thickness was recorded. All samples were subjected to a static strength test.

RESULTS:

The mean wall thickness reductions varied between 106.46 and 153.75 μm. The mean fracture strengths for the control and test groups were, respectively, 1211.90 ± 89.95 N and 873.11 ± 92.37 N in the external hexagon implants; 918.41 ± 97.19 N and 661.29 ± 58.03 N in the internal hexagon implants; and 1058.67 ± 114.05 N and 747.32 ± 90.05 N in the conical connection implants. Implant wall thickness and fracture resistance (P < 0.001) showed a positive correlation. Fracture strength was influenced by both implantoplasty (P < 0.001) and connection type (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Implantoplasty in diameter-reduced implants decreases implant wall thickness and fracture resistance, and varies depending on the implant-abutment connection. Internal hexagon and conical connection implants seem to be more prone to fracture after implantoplasty
RESUMEN
No disponible
Assuntos

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Implantação Dentária / Projeto do Implante Dentário-Pivô / Resistência à Flexão Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Efhre International University/Belize / University of Barcelona/Spain

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Implantação Dentária / Projeto do Implante Dentário-Pivô / Resistência à Flexão Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: Efhre International University/Belize / University of Barcelona/Spain
...