Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vitro experimental study of bonding between aluminium oxide ceramicsand resin cements
Roig-Vanaclocha, Ana; Román-Rodríguez, Juan L; Granell-Ruiz, Maria; Fons-Font, Antonio; Amigó-Borrás, Vicente; Busquets-Mataix, David; Vicente-Escuder, Ángel.
Afiliação
  • Roig-Vanaclocha, Ana; University of Valencia. Department of Stomatology. Valencia. Spain
  • Román-Rodríguez, Juan L; University of Valencia. Department of Stomatology. Valencia. Spain
  • Granell-Ruiz, Maria; University of Valencia. Department of Stomatology. Valencia. Spain
  • Fons-Font, Antonio; University of Valencia. Department of Stomatology. Valencia. Spain
  • Amigó-Borrás, Vicente; University Polytechnic. Institute of Materials Technology. Valencia. Spain
  • Busquets-Mataix, David; University Polytechnic. Institute of Materials Technology. Valencia. Spain
  • Vicente-Escuder, Ángel; University Polytechnic. Institute of Materials Technology. Valencia. Spain
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 15(1): 95-100, ene. 2010. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-78778
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: BNCS
ABSTRACT
To evaluate bond strengths of different resin cements to two aluminum oxide-based ceramics.

Methods:

Onehundred ten ceramic cylinders were produced and given four different surface treatments. Resin cement cylinderswere then bonded to the ceramic cylinders using different resin cements and the bond strength was determinedby shear testing to the breaking point. We were thus able to obtain results for the different combinations of porcelain,surface treatments and cements. All data was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for more than twoindependent samples and the Bonferroni correction applied (a=0.01). An optical microscopy study was carriedout to analyze the type of failure, and an electronic microscopy examination was carried out in order to evaluatethe changes produced in the ceramic by the different surface treatments.

Results:

The best values correspondedto the control group, composed of silicate ceramics combined with Variolink II resin cement. In-Ceram Aluminashowed no significant differences with respect to the type of cement applied. Procera AllCeram obtained the bestvalues when silica coated using the CoJet System and applying Variolink II, or when sandblasted and applyingClearfil SE Bond + Porcelain Bond Activator and Panavia F cement.

Significance:

Surface treatment modifies theceramic surface and influences the bond strength, as does the type of cement used. Silica coating is recommendedto improve adhesion to Procera AllCeram, applying Variolink II, or sandblasting plus resin cement containingMDP (Panavia F) (AU)
RESUMEN
No disponible
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Teste de Materiais / Cerâmica / Colagem Dentária / Cimentos de Resina / Óxido de Alumínio Tipo de estudo: Estudo de avaliação Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: University Polytechnic/Spain / University of Valencia/Spain
Buscar no Google
Coleções: Bases de dados nacionais / Espanha Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Teste de Materiais / Cerâmica / Colagem Dentária / Cimentos de Resina / Óxido de Alumínio Tipo de estudo: Estudo de avaliação Idioma: Inglês Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo Instituição/País de afiliação: University Polytechnic/Spain / University of Valencia/Spain
...