Does the release of tritiated noradrenaline accuratelly reflect the realease of endogenous noradrenaline from rat vas deferens nerve terminals?

RESUMO

To determine whether the release of tritiated noradrenaline (NA) from the sympathetic nerve terminals of the rat vas deferens is an accurate reflection of the release of endogenous NA, we compared the electrically-evoked release of tritiated and endogenous NA from the prostatic sections of the vasa deferentia of male rats. We found that while the release of tritiated NA was completely dependent on the presence of calcium, the release of endogenous NA was not. The overflow of both, tritiated and endogenous NA, was virtually unaffected by blockade of the neuronal uptake mechanism by desipramine. In contrast, blockade of the extraneuronal uptake greatly increased the overflow of endogenous NA, while having no effect on the overflow of tritiated NA. Tritiated NA release, on the other hand, was sensitive to prejunctional regulation, while the release of endogenous NA was not. Increases in stimulus train duration induced a significant increase in the release of endogenous NA, but not in that of tritiated NA. In contrast, the later responded to lower stimulus train frequencies and reached a plateau at lower frequency values as compared to the endogenous NA release. Our results indicate the existence of marked differences between the release of tritiated and endogenous NA. We conclude that 1) the assumption that tritiated NA release provides a good marker for endogenous NA release in the rat was deferens seems unwarranted; 2) the use of endogenous NA to study the release process in the vas deferens requires a re-examination of the experimental conditions used, in order to minimize possible artifacts that may obscure the study of neuronal release; 3) the choice between measuring the release of tritiated or endogenous NA must be evaluated for each tissue in particular, taking into account its cytoarchitecture, as well as the experimental conditions used