Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Cost-effectiveness of anatomical and functional test strategies for stable chest pain: public health perspective from a middle-income country.
BMJ Open ; 7(4): e012652, 2017 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28473507
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this research is to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of functional and anatomical strategies for diagnosing stable coronary artery disease (CAD), using exercise (Ex)-ECG, stress echocardiogram (ECHO), single-photon emission CT (SPECT), coronary CT angiography (CTA) or stress cardiacmagnetic resonance (C-MRI).SETTING: Decision-analytical model, comparing strategies of sequential tests for evaluating patients with possible stable angina in low, intermediate and high pretest probability of CAD, from the perspective of a developing nation's public healthcare system.PARTICIPANTS: Hypothetical cohort of patients with pretest probability of CAD between 20% and 70%. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is cost per correct diagnosis of CAD. Proportion of false-positive or false-negative tests and number of unnecessary tests performed were also evaluated.

RESULTS:

Strategies using Ex-ECG as initial test were the least costly alternatives but generated more frequent false-positive initial tests and false-negative final diagnosis. Strategies based on CTA or ECHO as initial test were the most attractive and resulted in similar cost-effectiveness ratios (I$ 286 and I$ 305 per correct diagnosis, respectively). A strategy based on C-MRI was highly effective for diagnosing stable CAD, but its high cost resulted in unfavourable incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) in moderate-risk and high-risk scenarios. Non-invasive strategies based on SPECT have been dominated.

CONCLUSIONS:

An anatomical diagnostic strategy based on CTA is a cost-effective option for CAD diagnosis. Functional strategies performed equally well when based on ECHO. C-MRI yielded acceptable ICER only at low pretest probability, and SPECT was not cost-effective in our analysis.
Assuntos

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Bases de dados internacionais Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor no Peito / Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Saúde Pública / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Teste de Esforço / Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca / Testes de Função Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Avaliação econômica em saúde Aspecto clínico: Diagnóstico / Etiologia / Predição / Prognóstico Limite: Humanos País/Região como assunto: América do Sul / Brasil Idioma: Inglês Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil