Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac MRI, FDG-PET, and myocardial biopsy for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Roth, Dominik; Kadoglou, Nikolaos; Leeflang, Mariska; Spijker, Rene; Herkner, Harald; Trivella, Marialena.
Afiliação
  • Roth D; 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX 3 7LD UK.
  • Kadoglou N; 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Leeflang M; 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX 3 7LD UK.
  • Spijker R; 3Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Herkner H; 3Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Trivella M; 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Diagn Progn Res ; 4: 5, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32399494
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

CS constitutes a rare but potentially underdiagnosed and fatal disease. Its diagnosis remains difficult owing to the infrequent and indistinguishable symptoms and the lack of formal diagnostic criteria dependent upon the diagnostic techniques used. Early diagnosis and treatment, however, may help to counter its poor prognosis.We aim to characterize and compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac MRI, FDG-PET and myocardial biopsy for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis and to advance and compare methods for complex diagnostic test accuracy reviews and meta-analysis.

METHODS:

Following a systematic review on DTA studies on the aforementioned topic, a four-part approach to meta-analysis will be used (1) direct comparison of index tests with clinical reference standard, (2) indirect comparison of index tests with clinical reference standard, (3) addition of an alternative test to that indirect comparison (4) and Bayesian meta-analysis using results of part 3 as informative prior for comparisons analogous to part 1 and 2.

DISCUSSION:

The most widely recognized diagnostic algorithm for cardiac sarcoidosis is considered out of date, as it precedes the introduction of imaging techniques in diagnostic pathways. These novel imaging techniques, like CMR and FDG-PET scan, have emerged as promising diagnostic tools which may fill the current diagnostic gap. Thus, a systematic review and evaluation of CS diagnosis are much needed. Such an attempt is anticipated to alter the current diagnostic guidelines for CS by shedding more light on the role of sophisticated imaging techniques on prompt CS therapy and follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42019047126.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Progn Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Progn Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM