Validation Study for the N Descriptor of the Newly Proposed Ninth Edition of the TNM Staging System Proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to validate the discriminatory ability and clinical utility of the N descriptor of the newly proposed ninth edition of the TNM staging system for lung cancer in a large independent cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent curative surgery for NSCLC between January 2004 and December 2019. The N descriptor of patients included in this study was retrospectively reclassified based on the ninth edition of the TNM classification. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model to compare adjacent N categories. RESULTS: A total of 6649 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period was 54 months. According to the newly proposed ninth edition N classification, 5573 patients (83.8%), 639 patients (9.6%), 268 patients (4.0%), and 169 patients (2.5%) were classified into the clinical N0, N1, N2a, and N2b categories and 4957 patients (74.6%), 744 patients (11.2%), 567 patients (8.5%), and 381 patients (5.7%) were classified into the pathologic N0, N1, N2a, and N2b categories, respectively. The prognostic differences between all adjacent clinical and pathologic N categories were highly significant in terms of both overall survival and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We validated the clinical utility of the newly proposed ninth edition N classification for both clinical and pathologic stages in NSCLC. The new N classification revealed clear prognostic separation between all categories (N0, N1, N2a, and N2b) in terms of both overall survival and recurrence-free survival.