Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Empowering gynaecologists with Artificial Intelligence: Tailoring surgical solutions for fibroids.
Sinha, Rooma; Raina, Rohit; Bag, Moumita; Rupa, Bana.
Afiliação
  • Sinha R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Apollo Health City, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500033, India.
  • Raina R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Apollo Health City, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500033, India. Electronic address: rohitraina52@rediffmail.com.
  • Bag M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Apollo Health City, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500033, India.
  • Rupa B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Apollo Health City, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500033, India.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 299: 72-77, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838389
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In recent years, the integration ofArtificial intelligence (AI) into various fields of medicine including Gynaecology, has shown promising potential. Surgical treatment of fibroid is myomectomy if uterine preservation and fertility are the primary aims. AI usage begins with the involvement of LLM (Large Language Model) from the point when a patient visits a gynecologist, from identifying signs and symptoms to reaching a diagnosis, providing treatment plans, and patient counseling.

OBJECTIVE:

Use of AI (ChatGPT versus Google Bard) in the surgical management of fibroid. STUDY

DESIGN:

Identifyingthe patient's problems using LLMs like ChatGPT and Google Bard and giving a treatment optionin 8 clinical scenarios of fibroid. Data entry was done using M.S. Excel and was statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 26) for M.S. Windows 2010. All results were presented in tabular form. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests Chi-square tests or Fisher exact test.pvalues < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The sensitivity of both techniques was calculated. We have used Cohen's Kappa to know the degree of agreement.

RESULTS:

We found that on the first attempt, ChatGPT gave general answers in 62.5 % of cases and specific answers in 37.5 % of cases. ChatGPT showed improved sensitivity on successive prompts 37.5 % to 62.5 % on the third prompt. Google Bard could not identify the clinical question in 50 % of cases and gave incorrect answers in 12.5 % of cases (p = 0.04). Google Bard showed the same sensitivity of 25 % on all prompts.

CONCLUSION:

AI helps to reduce the time to diagnose and plan a treatment strategy for fibroid and acts as a powerful tool in the hands of a gynecologist. However, the usage of AI by patients for self-treatment is to be avoided and should be used only for education and counseling about fibroids.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Inteligência Artificial / Ginecologia / Leiomioma Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia País de publicação: IE / IRELAND / IRLANDA

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Inteligência Artificial / Ginecologia / Leiomioma Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia País de publicação: IE / IRELAND / IRLANDA