Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of non-immersive virtual reality radiographic positioning simulation on first-year radiography students' image evaluation performance.
Miller, E M; Schmid, K K; Abbey, B M.
Afiliação
  • Miller EM; Radiography Education, Department of Clinical, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Sciences, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 2402 University Drive Kearney, NE 68849, United States of America. Electronic address: ellie.miller@unmc.edu.
  • Schmid KK; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984375 Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, NE 68198, United States of America. Electronic address: kkschmid@unmc.edu.
  • Abbey BM; Kinesiology and Sport Sciences Department, Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, University of Nebraska at Kearney, 1410 W 26th St. Kearney, Ne 68849, United States of America. Electronic address: abbeybm@unk.edu.
Radiography (Lond) ; 30(4): 1180-1186, 2024 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889476
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Optimal radiographic image quality is critical because it affects the accuracy of the reporter's interpretation. Radiographers have an ethical obligation to obtain quality diagnostic images while protecting patients from unnecessary radiation, including minimizing rejected and repeated images. Repeated imaging due to positioning errors have increased in recent years.

METHODS:

This study evaluated the effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality (VR) simulation on first-year students' evaluation of positioning errors on resultant knee and lumbar spine images. Crossover intervention design was used to deliver radiographic image evaluation instruction through traditional lecture and guided simulation using non-immersive VR to 33 first-year radiography students at a single academic institution located across four geographic program locations. Pre- and post-test knowledge assessments examined participants' ability to recognize positioning errors on multiple-choice and essay questions.

RESULTS:

Raw mean scores increased on multiple choice questions across the entire cohort for the knee (M = 0.82, SD = 3.38) and lumbar spine (M = 2.91, SD = 3.69) but there was no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.60). Essay questions reported very minimal to no raw mean score increases for the knee (M = 0.27, SD = 2.78) and lumbar spine (M = 0.00, SD = 2.55), with no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.72).

CONCLUSION:

Guided simulation instruction was shown to be as effective as traditional lecture. Results also suggest that novice learners better recognize image evaluation errors and corrections from a list of options but have not yet achieved the level of competence needed to independently evaluate radiographic images for diagnostic criteria. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Non-immersive VR simulation is an effective tool for image evaluation instruction. VR increases access to authentic image evaluation practice by providing a simulated resultant image based off the students' applied positioning skills.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Competência Clínica / Posicionamento do Paciente / Realidade Virtual Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Radiography (Lond) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Competência Clínica / Posicionamento do Paciente / Realidade Virtual Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Radiography (Lond) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS