Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A novel method to optimize personal IOL constants.
Buonsanti, Dante; Cooke, David L; Hoffer, Kenneth J; Savini, Giacomo; Lupardi, Enrico; Buonsanti, Jorge; Aramberri, Jaime.
Afiliação
  • Buonsanti D; Centro Buonsanti, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: dantebuonsanti@gmail.com.
  • Cooke DL; Great Lakes Eye Care, Saint Joseph, MI, USA.
  • Hoffer KJ; Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; St. Mary's Eye Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Savini G; G.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S., Rome, Italy; Studio Oculistico d'Azeglio, Bologna, Italy.
  • Lupardi E; Ophthalmology Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Buonsanti J; Centro Buonsanti, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Aramberri J; Ophthalmology Clinic Miranza Begitek, San Sebastian, Spain.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 2024 Aug 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39218385
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe a novel method called 'three variable optimization' that entails a process of doing just one calculation to zero out the mean prediction error of an entire dataset (regardless of size), using only 3 variables 1) the constant used, 2) the average intraocular lens (IOL) power and 3) the average PE.

DESIGN:

Development, evaluation, and testing of a method to optimize personal IOL constants.

METHODS:

A dataset of 876 eyes was used as a training set, and another dataset of 1,079 eyes was used to test the method. The Barrett Universal II, Cooke K6, Haigis, RBF 3.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, SRK/T and T2 were analyzed. The same dataset was also divided into 3 subgroups (short, medium and long eyes). The three variable optimization process was applied to each dataset and subset, and the obtained optimized constants were then used to obtain the mean PE of each dataset. We then compared those results with those obtained by zeroing out the mean PE in the classical method.

RESULTS:

The three variable optimization showed similar results to classical optimization with less data needed to optimize and no clinically significant difference. Dividing the dataset into subsets of short, medium and long eyes, also shows that the method is useful even in those situations. Finally, the method was tested in multiple formulas and it was able to reduce the PE with no clinical significant difference from classical optimization.

CONCLUSION:

This method could then be applied by surgeons to optimize their constants by reducing the mean prediction error to zero without prior technical knowledge and it is available online for free at http//wwww.ioloptimization.com.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos