Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Ivermectin as add-on Therapy in COVID-19 Management (Pilot Trial)
Faiq I. Gorial; Sabeeh Mashhadani; Hend M Sayaly; Basim Dhawi Dakhil; Marwan M AlMashhadani; Adnan M Aljabory; , Hassan M Abbas; Mohammed Ghanim; Jawad I Rasheed.
Afiliação
  • Faiq I. Gorial; College of Medicine-University of baghdad
  • Sabeeh Mashhadani; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad
  • Hend M Sayaly; Medical City Teaching Hospital
  • Basim Dhawi Dakhil; Medical City Teaching Hospital
  • Marwan M AlMashhadani; Medical City Teaching Hospital
  • Adnan M Aljabory; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad
  • , Hassan M Abbas; Medical City Teaching Hospital,
  • Mohammed Ghanim; Medical City Teaching Hospital
  • Jawad I Rasheed; Medical City Teaching Hospital
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20145979
ABSTRACT
BackgroundTo date no effective therapy has been demonstrated for COVID-19. In vitro, studies indicated that ivermectin (IVM) has antiviral effect. ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of ivermectin (IVM) as add-on therapy to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZT) in treatment of COVID-19. MethodsThis Pilot clinical trial conducted on hospitalized adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 diagnosed according to WHO interim guidance. Sixteen Patients received a single dose of IVM 200Mcg /kg on admission day as add on therapy to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)and Azithromycin (AZT) and were compared with 71 controls received HCQ and AZT matched in age, gender, clinical features, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was percentage of cured patients, defined as symptoms free to be discharged from the hospital and 2 consecutive negative PCR test from nasopharyngeal swabs at least 24 hours apart. The secondary outcomes were time to cure in both groups and evaluated by measuring time from admission of the patient to the hospital till discharge. ResultsOf 87 patients included in the study,t he mean age {+/-} SD (range) of patients in the IVM group was similar to controls [44.87 {+/-} 10.64 (28-60) vs 45.23 {+/-} 18.47 (8-80) years, p=0.78] Majority of patients in both groups were male but statistically not significant [11(69%) versus 52 (73%), with male female ratio 2.21 versus 2.7-, p=0.72) All the patients of IVM group were cured compared with the controls [16 (100 %) vs 69 (97.2 %)]. Two patients died in the controls. The mean time to stay in the hospital was significantly lower in IVM group compared with the controls (7.62 {+/-} 2.75 versus 13.22 {+/-}5.90 days, p=0.00005, effect size= 0.82). No adverse events were observed ConclusionsAdd-on use of IVM to HCQ and AZT had better effectiveness, shorter hospital stay, and relatively safe compared with controls. however, a larger prospective study with longer follow up may be needed to validate these results.
Licença
cc_by_nc
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Experimental_studies / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
Texto completo: Disponível Coleções: Preprints Base de dados: medRxiv Tipo de estudo: Cohort_studies / Experimental_studies / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Rct Idioma: Inglês Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Preprint
...