Voiding symptoms obtained by open versus directed anamnesis as predictors of voiding dysfunction in women

ABSTRACT Objectives To determine the differences between voiding symptoms obtained by open anamnesis (VS-Open) versus voiding symptoms obtained by directed anamnesis (VS-Directed) to predict voiding dysfunction in women. Materials and Methods Retrospective study of women with prior anti-incontinence surgery evaluated during 5 years. In a standardized clinical history taking, each patient was asked to answer question number five of the UDI-6 questionnaire ("Do you experience any difficulty emptying your bladder?"). If the answer was positive, the following voiding symptoms spontaneously described by the patient were documented: slow urine stream, straining to void, intermittent stream and feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, which were considered VS-Open. If the answer to this question was negative or if the patient had not reported the four voiding symptoms, she was asked in a directed manner about the presence of each o Ninety-one women are analyzed. Eighteen patients presented voiding dysfunction (19.8%), There was a statistical association between voiding dysfunction and the presence of any VS-Open (p = 0.037) and straining to void obtained by open anamnesis (p = 0.013). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio, respectively, were 44.4% and 27.8%, 80.8% and 94.5%, 36.3% and 55.6%, 85.5% and 84.1%, 2.324 and 5.129, and 0.686 and 0.764. There was no statistical association between voiding dysfunction and VS-Directed. Conclusions VS-Open may predict better voiding dysfunction than VS-Directed in women.

Impacto de la rehabilitación del piso pelviano en la calidad de vida de mujeres con incontinencia urinaria / Impact of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation on the Quality of Life of Women with Urinary Incontinence

Objetivos: Evaluar el impacto en la calidad de vida de mujeres con diversos tipos de incontinencia urinaria, en quienes se realizó un programa de entrenamiento de la musculatura del piso pelviano (EMPP). Materiales y métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y analítico que evaluó a mujeres con incontinencia urinaria derivadas al Centro Urológico Profesor Bengió para realizar rehabilitación del piso pelviano entre enero de 2014 y diciembre de 2015. Todas las pacientes recibieron EMPP como primera línea de tratamiento. La calidad de vida fue evaluada mediante cuestionarios validados, entre los que se realizó UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Index), IIQ-7 (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) versión corta e IQoL (Incontinence Quality of Life). Las variables continuas fueron comparadas a través de pruebas pareadas de T test y las categóricas por el método de chi cuadrado (X2 ). Las puntuaciones fueron evaluadas previo y posterior al EMPP. Se definió una p<0,05 como estadísticamente significativa. Resultados: La población en estudio se remitió a 82 pacientes. La mejoría subjetiva expresada por las pacientes en una escala de 0-10 fue de 6,33 (desvío estándar [DE]=2,42) con una mediana de 7. En la población general existe una declinación en el cuestionario UDI-6 (-2,6; p<0,0001), IIQ-7 (-2,4; p=0,0001) y un aumento en IQoL (11,35; p<0,0001). En los diferentes tipos de incontinencia urinaria (esfuerzo, urgencia y mixta) también se observó una mejoría individual en todos los cuestionarios en cada tipo de incontinencia urinaria, excepto en el cuestionario IQoL (p=0,34) en pacientes con incontinencia de orina de esfuerzo. Conclusiones: El EMPP representa una terapia no invasiva efectiva en el tratamiento de diversas formas de incontinencia de orina, produciendo un impacto favorable en la calidad de vida de mujeres que padecen esta patología.(AU)

Objectives: To assess the impact on the quality of life in women with different types of urinary incontinence, who was a training of the musculature of the pelvic floor muscle (TMPP) program. Materials and methods: Was a retrospective, descriptive and analytical study evaluated women with urinary incontinence derived for rehabilitation of pelvic floor between January 2014 and December 2015. All patients received TMPP as first line treatment. Quality of life was evaluated performing validated questionnaires, which was carried out: UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Index), IIQ-7 (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) short version and IQoL (Incontinence Quality of Life). Continuous variables were compared through the categorical and paired T test tests by chi square (X2 ) method. Scores were assessed pre and post the TMPP. Defined a p<0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The study population was referred to 82 patients. Subjective improvement expressed by patients on a scale of 0-10 was 6.33 (standard deviation [SD]=2.42) with a median of 7. In the general population, there is a decline in the UDI-6 questionnaire (-2.6; p<0.0001), IIQ-7 (-2.4; p=0.0001) and an increase in the IQoL (11.35; p<0.0001). In the different types of urinary incontinence (stress, urgency and mixed) also find an individual improvement in all the questionnaires in each type of urinary incontinence, except in questionnaire IQoL (p=0.34) in patients who are stress urinary incontinence. Conclusions: The TMPP represents a therapy effective non-invasive in the treatment of various forms of urinary incontinence producing a positive impact on the quality of life of women living with this disease.(AU)