Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(3): 468-477, May-June 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012330

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: To determine the impact of time from biopsy to surgery on outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) as the optimal interval between prostate biopsy and RP is unknown. Material and methods: We identified 7, 350 men who underwent RP at our institution between 1994 and 2012 and had a prostate biopsy within one year of surgery. Patients were grouped into five time intervals for analysis: ≤ 3 weeks, 4-6 weeks, 7-12 weeks, 12-26 weeks, and > 26 weeks. Oncologic outcomes were stratified by NCCN disease risk for comparison. The associations of time interval with clinicopathologic features and survival were evaluated using multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses. Results: Median time from biopsy to surgery was 61 days (IQR 37, 84). Median follow-up after RP was 7.1 years (IQR 4.2, 11.7) while the overall perioperative complication rate was 19.7% (1,448/7,350). Adjusting for pre-operative variables, men waiting 12-26 weeks until RP had the highest likelihood of nerve sparing (OR: 1.45, p = 0.02) while those in the 4-6 week group had higher overall complications (OR: 1.33, p = 0.01). High risk men waiting more than 6 months had higher rates of biochemical recurrence (HR: 3.38, p = 0.05). Limitations include the retrospective design. Conclusions: Surgery in the 4-6 week time period after biopsy is associated with higher complications. There appears to be increased biochemical recurrence rates in delaying RP after biopsy, for men with both low and high risk disease.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Biópsia , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Variância , Resultado do Tratamento , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Medição de Risco , Progressão da Doença , Gradação de Tumores , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(3): 491-499, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-954057

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: Vaginal cuff recurrence of tumor following radical cystectomy is a rare site of disease recurrence, however it has never been specifically studied. The aim of the study is to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and long-term oncologic outcomes of vaginal cuff recur- rence in a cohort of female patients treated with radical cystectomy for invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Materials and Methods: From 1985 to 2012, a prospectively maintained institutional blad- der cancer registry was queried for vaginal cuff recurrence post radical cystectomy. Over- all mortality and cancer-specific mortality were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method for patients with vaginal cuff recurrence, recurrence at another local or distant site, and those without evidence of recurrence. Comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to assess predictors of vaginal cuff recurrence. Results: From 469 women treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, 34 patients (7.3%) developed vaginal cuff recurrence, 130 patients (27.7%) had recurrence involving ei- ther a local or distant site, and 305 patients (65%) had no evidence of recurrence. The 5-year overall mortality-free survival rate was 32.4% for vaginal cuff recurrence, but 25.0% for other sites of recurrence. Cancer-specific mortality-free survival rate was 32.4% for vaginal cuff recurrence, and 30.3% for the other sites of recurrence. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of tumor in posterior location at radical cystectomy (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.353 [95% CI, 0.159-0.783]) and anterior vaginec- tomy, compared to no vaginectomy (HR, 2.595 [95% CI, 1.077-6.249]) were independently associated with vaginal cuff recurrence. Conclusion: Anterior vaginectomy, despite our best attempts, is perhaps not sufficient to prevent vaginal cuff recurrence. Therefore, follow-up evaluation is essential, and further studies are necessary to address the optimal approach for initial management. Patient Summary: Although vaginal cuff recurrence is an unusual site of recurrence, careful evaluation is needed before cystectomy and during follow-up to identify patients at risk.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Neoplasias Vaginais/etiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Carcinoma/epidemiologia , Cistectomia/métodos , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Vaginais/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/mortalidade , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA