Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clinics ; 72(5): 258-264, May 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-840078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with perioperative morbidity, mortality and oncological outcomes after multivisceral en bloc resection in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2009 and February 2014, 105 patients with primary colorectal cancer selected for multivisceral resection were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and pathological factors, perioperative morbidity and mortality and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Estimated local recurrence and overall survival were compared using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independence of the studied parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02859155. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 60 (range 23-86) years, 66.7% were female, 80% of tumors were located in the rectum, 11.4% had stage-IV disease, and 54.3% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The organs most frequently resected were ovaries and annexes (37%). Additionally, 30.5% of patients received abdominoperineal resection. Invasion of other organs was confirmed histologically in 53.5% of patients, and R0 resection was obtained in 72% of patients. The overall morbidity rate of patients in this study was 37.1%. Ureter resection and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with an increased number of complications. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.9%. After 27 (range 5-57) months of follow-up, the mortality and local recurrence rates were 23% and 15%, respectively. Positive margins were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Positive margins, lymph node involvement, stage III/IV disease, and stage IV disease alone were associated with lower overall survival rates. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with reduced survival was lymph node involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Multivisceral en bloc resection for primary colorectal cancer can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality and may lead to favorable oncological outcomes.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Morbidade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Vísceras/patologia , Vísceras/cirurgia
2.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 46(4): 294-299, out.-dez. 2009. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-539624

RESUMO

Context: Controversy regarding the best operative choice for familial adenomatous polyposis lays between the morbidity of restorative proctocolectomy and the supposed mortality due to rectal cancer after ileorectal anastomosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate operative complications and oncological outcome after ileorectal anastomosis and restorative proctocolectomy. Methods: Charts from patients treated between 1977 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and endoscopic data, results of treatment, pathological reports and information regarding early and late outcome were recorded. Results: Eighty-eight patients - 41 men (46.6 percent) and 47 women (53.4 percent) - were assisted. At diagnosis, 53 patients (60.2 percent) already had associated colorectal cancer. Operative complications occurred in 25 patients (29.0 percent), being 17 (19.7 percent) early and 8 (9.3 percent) late complications. There were more complications after restorative proctocolectomy (48.1 percent) compared to proctocolectomy with ileostomy (26.6 percent) and ileorectal anastomosis (19.0 percent) (P = 0,03). There was no operative mortality. During the follow-up of 36 ileorectal anastomosis, cancer developed in the rectal cuff in six patients (16,6 percent). Cumulative cancer risk after ileorectal anastomosis was 17.2 percent at 5 years, 24.1 percent at 10 years and 43.1 percent at 15 years of follow-up. Age-dependent cumulative risk started at 30 years (4.3 percent), went to 9.6 percent at 40 years, 20.9 percent at 40 years and 52 percent at 60 years. Among the 26 patients followed after restorative proctocolectomy, it was found cancer in the ileal pouch in 1 (3.8 percent). Conclusions: 1. Operative complications occurred in about one third of the patients, being more frequently after the confection of ileal reservoir; 2. greater age and previous colonic carcinoma were associated with the development of rectal cancer after ileorectal anastomosis; 3. patients treated...


Contexto: As controvérsias quanto a melhor forma de tratamento da polipose adenomatosa familiar confrontam a morbidade da proctocolectomia restauradora contra a suposta mortalidade decorrente de câncer retal após íleo-reto anastomose. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar as complicações operatórias e a evolução oncológica dos pacientes submetidos a íleo-reto anastomose ou proctocolectomia restauradora. Métodos: Analisaram-se os dados dos doentes tratados entre 1977 e 2006, procedendo ao levantamento de dados clínicos gerais, endoscópicos, resultados do tratamento cirúrgico, dados anatomopatológicos e informações sobre a evolução precoce e tardia dos pacientes. Resultados: Foram tratados 88 pacientes, sendo 41 homens (46,6 por cento) e 47 mulheres (53,4 por cento). Por ocasião do diagnóstico, 53 pacientes (60,2 por cento) já tinham câncer colorretal associado à polipose. Registraram-se complicações operatórias em 25 doentes (29,0 por cento) dentre os 86 operados, sendo 17 (19,7 por cento) precoces e 8 (9,3 por cento) tardias. Houve mais complicações após proctocolectomia restauradora (48,1 por cento) em comparação às proctocolectomias com ileostomia (26,6 por cento) e íleo-reto anastomose (19,0 por cento) (P = 0,03). Não houve mortalidade operatória. O risco cumulativo de câncer retal após íleo-reto anastomose foi de 17,2 por cento após 5 anos, 24,1 por cento após 10 anos e 43,1 por cento após 15 anos de seguimento pós-operatório. Já o risco cumulativo idade-dependente começou a existir a partir de 30 anos (4,3 por cento), passando para 9,6 por cento aos 40 anos, 20,9 por cento aos 40 anos e 52 por cento aos 60 anos. Entre os pacientes submetidos a bolsa ileal com seguimento (26), apenas 1 doente (3,8 por cento) desenvolveu câncer na bolsa ileal. Conclusões: 1. Ocorreram complicações operatórias em cerca de 1/3 dos pacientes, sendo mais frequentes após a confecção de bolsa ileal; 2. idade maior, tempo de seguimento e câncer colônico prévio se associaram...


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Polipose Adenomatosa do Colo/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Íleo/cirurgia , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Retais/etiologia , Reto/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Seguimentos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA