Adherence to BCLC recommendations for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: impact on survival according to stage

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the adherence of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma patients to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system treatment guidelines and to examine the impact of adherence on the survival of patients in different stages of the disease. METHODS: This study included all patients referred for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma between 2010 and 2012. Patients (n=364) were classified according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines. Deviations from the recommended guidelines were discussed, and treatment was determined by a multidisciplinary team. The overall survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The overall rate of adherence to the guidelines was 52%. The rate of adherence of patients in each scoring group varied as follows: stage 0, 33%; stage A, 45%; stage B, 78%; stage C, 35%; and stage D, 67%. In stage 0/A, adherent patients had a significantly better overall survival than non-adherent patients (hazard ratio=0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.42; p<0.001). Among the stage D patients, the overall survival rate was worse in adherent patients than in non-adherent patients (hazard ratio=4.0, 95% CI: 1.67-9.88; p<0.001), whereas no differences were observed in patients in stages B or C. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of adherence to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system in clinical practice varies according to clinical disease stage. Adherence to the recommended guidelines positively impacts survival, especially in patients with early-stage disease.

Análise da sobrevida de pacientes com carcinoma hepatocelular atendidos no Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo / Survival analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

INTRODUÇÃO: Na maioria dos casos, o carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) acomete pacientes com cirrose hepática. O algoritmo do Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer group (BCLC) considera função hepática, características tumorais e, estado geral do paciente para definir o tratamento. Entretanto, a aplicabilidade de um algoritmo terapêutico nem sempre é possível na prática clínica. Este estudo buscou avaliar a aderência às recomendações do BCLC para tratamento dos pacientes com CHC e analisar o impacto sobre a sobrevida nos diferentes estádios. MÉTODOS: Este estudo incluiu todos os pacientes encaminhados para o Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo para tratamento do CHC entre 2010 e 2012. Os pacientes (n = 364) foram classificados de acordo com as recomendações do BCLC. Se a terapia proposta não foi aplicada, o caso foi considerado como não aderente e as causas foram investigadas. A curva de sobrevida global foi estimada pelo método de sobrevida de Kaplan-Meier e comparada pela regressão de Cox. RESULTADOS: A porcentagem de aderência às recomendações do BCLC foi de 52% e variou entre os estádios: BCLC 0/A, 44%; BCLC B, 78%; BCLC C, 35%; e BCLC D, 67%. A taxa de sobrevida global, em um, dois e três anos, foi de 63, 45 e 33%, respectivamente. Nos pacientes aderentes do estádio BCLC 0/A, a sobrevida global foi significantemente melhor se comparada aos pacientes não aderentes (razão de risco [RR] = 0,19, intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%: 0,09-0,42; p < 0,001). Nos pacientes do estádio BCLC D, a taxa de sobrevida global foi pior em pacientes aderentes comparada aos pacientes não aderentes (RR = 4,0; IC 95%: 1,67-9,88; p < 0,001). Nenhuma diferença foi observada em pacientes do estádio BCLC B ou C classificados como aderentes ou não aderentes. CONCLUSÕES: A porcentagem de aderência às recomendações do BCLC na prática clínica é baixa e varia entre os estádios. A não aderência está associada a pior prognóstico, particularmente em pacientes com estádio precoce.

INTRODUCTION: In most cases, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) affects patients with liver cirrhosis. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer group (BCLC) algorithm takes into consideration liver function, tumor variables and patients general status to guide therapy. However, the application of a therapeutic algorithm is not always feasible in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma patients to the BCLC treatment guidelines, as well as examine the impact on survival in different stages. METHODS: This study included all patients referred to Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo for HCC therapy between 2010 and 2012. Patients (n = 364) were classified according to BCLC stage. If the proposed HCC therapy could not be applied, the case was considered to represent deviations from the recommended BCLC guideline. Causes of treatment deviations were investigated. The overall survival (OS) curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival method and compared by Cox regression. RESULTS: The overall percentage of adherence to BCLC guidelines was 52 % and varied among the disease stages: BCLC 0/A, 44 %; BCLC B, 78 %; BCLC C, 35 %; and BCLC D, 67 %. One-, two-, and three-year OS rates were 63, 45, and 33 %, respectively. In BCLC 0/A, adherent patients presented a significantly better OS compared to non-adherent patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-0.42; p < 0.001). In BCLC D, the OS rate was worse in adherent patients compared to non-adherent patients (HR = 4.0, 95% CI: 1.67-9.88; p < 0.001), whereas no differences were observed in BCLC stage B or C. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of adherence to BCLC recommendations in clinical practice is low and varies among the clinical stages. Non-adherence is associated with a worse prognosis, particularly in early stage disease.

Clinical and epidemiological aspects of hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil

OBJECTIVES: We performed a national survey to update hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) epidemiology in Brazil and determined the clinical and epidemiological profiles of patients with HCC in different Brazilian regions. METHODS: Data from 29 centers included 1,405 patients diagnosed with HCC from 2004 to 2009. RESULTS: The median age was 59 (1-92 years old; 78 percent male). At diagnosis, females were older than males (median age: 62 vs. 59 years old respectively; p<0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of the patients had cirrhosis (1279/1308). Hepatitis C virus was the main etiology (54 percent), followed by hepatitis B virus (16 percent) and alcohol (14 percent). In Southeastern and Southern Brazil, hepatitis C virus accounted for over 55 percent of cases. In the Northeast and North, hepatitis C virus accounted for less than 50 percent, and hepatitis B virus accounted for 22-25 percent of cases; hepatitis B was more prevalent in the Northern than in the Southern regions. Some 43 percent, 35 percent, and 22 percent of patients were in early, intermediate, and advanced stages respectively. Initial therapies for HCC included chemoembolization or embolization (36 percent), percutaneous ablation (13 percent), liver resection (7 percent), and sorafenib (1 percent). Liver transplantation was performed in 242 patients (19 percent), but it was the initial therapy for only 56 patients (4 percent). CONCLUSION: The epidemiology, classification, and therapy selection for HCC varied among Brazilian regions. Hepatitis C infection was the most common etiology of liver cirrhosis; chemoembolization was the most common therapy employed. Liver cirrhosis was the main risk factor for HCC development in Brazil.