Seroprevalence of trypanosoma cruzi infection among blood donors in the state of Bahia, Brazil

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Chagas disease (CD) affects 5.7-7.0 million individuals worldwide, and its prevalence reached 25.1% in the state of Bahia, Brazil. There is an association between the prevalence of CD, the socioeconomic status of the population, and the risk of re-emergence due to non-vectorial transmission, such as blood transfusion. This study determined the seroprevalence of T. cruzi infection among blood donors in the state of Bahia, located in northeastern Brazil, and their epidemiological profile during a 10-year period. METHODS: We performed a descriptive cross-sectional study involving a database review. Data were collected from patients with non-negative results for T. cruzi infection during a 10-year period. RESULTS: A total of 3,084 (0.62%) samples were non-negative for T. cruzi infection in an initial serological screening, and 810 (0.16%) samples were non-negative in the second screening. The correlation between infection and age (30 years or older) and between infection and lower educational level (12 years or less) in the first and second screening was statistically significant. The seroprevalence of T. cruzi infection was higher in men in the first screening. In addition, 99.52% of the municipalities of Bahia had at least one case of CD. Livramento de Nossa Senhora and Salvador presented the highest disease prevalence and recurrence, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The seroprevalence of T. cruzi infection in these populations was lower than that found in other studies in Brazil but was comparatively higher in densely-populated areas. The demographic characteristics of our population agreed with previous studies.

Avaliação do protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas para o tratamento para hepatite B crônica nas regiões nordeste e norte do Brasil / Analysis of clinical protocol and guidelines therapeutic for treatment for chronic hepatitis B in northeast Brazil and regions north

No Brasil o tratamento para Hepatite B cônica, tem sido disponibilizado pelo Sistema Único de Saúde há mais de 10 anos. O objetivo foi analisar o tratamento dos pacientes com hepatite B crônica, em dois Centros de Referência em Hepatites Virais na Região Nordeste e Norte do Brasil, comparando com o Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas da Hepatite B do Ministério da Saúde. Foram incluídos no estudo 527 pacientes em atendimento ambulatorial. No algoritmo 4.1 foi observado que existe uma dificuldade em seguir a recomendação do Ministério da Saúde, nos dois serviços de referência, 78,9% e 72% Região Nordeste e Norte respectivamente. O algoritmo 4.2, foi o algoritmo que apresentou no geral mais de 90% de seguimento na recomendação do Protocolo Clínico, devido que os pacientes são na sua grande maioria AgHBe negativo. O algoritmo 4.3 aproximadamente 85% dos pacientes da Região Nordeste estava dentro da recomendação do Protocolo Clínico para Hepatite B crônica, entretanto, nenhum paciente da Região Norte. O Protocolo Clínico de Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Hepatite B foi um grande passo e avanço. Uma ferramenta importantíssima dentro da realidade do tratamento para Hepatite B e foi possível incorporar novas drogas e indicadores de tratamento embasados na Medicina Baseada em Evidencias e nos Consensos Internacionais pelo Ministério da Saúde.

In Brazil the treatment for Hepatitis B conical, has been provided by the National Health System for over 10 years. The aim was to analyze the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B in two reference centers in Viral Hepatitis in the Northeast and North of Brazil, compared to the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines Hepatitis B of the Ministry of Health. The study included 527 patients in outpatient care. In algorithm 4.1 it was observed that there is a difficulty in following the recommendation of the Ministry of Health in two reference centers, 78.9% and 72% northeast and north respectively. The 4.2 algorithm, the algorithm was presented in general more than 90% follow-up on the recommendation of the Clinical Protocol because patients are mostly negative HBeAg. The algorithm 4.3 approximately 85% of patients in the Northeast was in the recommendation of the Clinical Protocol for chronic hepatitis B, however, no patients in the Northern Region. The Clinical Protocol Therapeutic Guidelines for Hepatitis B was a big step and advance. An important tool within the reality of treatment for hepatitis B and it was possible to incorporate new drugs and treatment indicators grounded in Evidence-Based Medicine and the International Consensus by the Ministry of Health.